Abstract
Quality of life of German surgeons: results of a survey of 3,652 attendees of the annual meetings of the German Surgical Societies Background and objective: Quality of life is of vital importance for patients undergoing surgery. However, little is known about the quality of life of surgeons who are facing a stressful and dramatically changing working environment. For this reason, this large scale ...
Abstract
Quality of life of German surgeons: results of a survey of 3,652 attendees of the annual meetings of the German Surgical Societies Background and objective: Quality of life is of vital importance for patients undergoing surgery. However, little is known about the quality of life of surgeons who are facing a stressful and dramatically changing working environment. For this reason, this large scale study investigated the quality of life (QL) of surgeons in Germany in the context of occupational, private, and system-related risk factors with a standardized QL measurement instrument. Methods: The study population consisted of attendees (surgeons, non-surgical physicians, medical students) of the nine major annual conferences of the German Society of Surgery between 2008 and 2009. Participants filled in a single questionnaire including study-specific questions (demographic variables, professional position, and occupational situation) and a standardized quality of life instrument. Surgeons' responses with regard to their professional situation and their quality of life were contrasted with those of the two controls (non-surgical physicians, i.e. orthopedics, pediatrics, gastroenterologists and medical students). Furthermore, QL scores were compared with German population reference data and with reference data of several patient groups. Results: 3652 individuals (2991 surgeons, 561 non-surgical physicians, 100 medical students) participated in this study. 68% of the surgeons but only 39% of the non-surgeons worked more than 60 hours per week on average. Surgeons reported restrictions on their private and family life due to work overload, more so than non-surgeons (74% vs. 59%). Responses to the PLC quality of life questionnaire confirmed these results, showing score values lower than those of the German population reference data and of several patient groups. Conclusion: The time has come for surgeons to consider their own quality of life, as this is a main issue in their scientific and clinical work with patients.
Altmetric