| Item type: | Article | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal or Publication Title: | Frontiers in Zoology | ||||
| Publisher: | BIOMED CENTRAL LTD | ||||
| Place of Publication: | LONDON | ||||
| Volume: | 5 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 1 | ||||
| Page Range: | p. 15 | ||||
| Date: | 2008 | ||||
| Institutions: | Biology, Preclinical Medicine > Institut für Zoologie | ||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||
| Keywords: | CRYPTOTERMES-SECUNDUS; WING DIMORPHISM; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; FOOD CONDITIONS; EVOLUTION; COOPERATION; CASTE; EUSOCIALITY; ISOPTERA; INSECTS | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 500 Science > 590 Zoological sciences | ||||
| Status: | Published | ||||
| Refereed: | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | Yes | ||||
| Item ID: | 67826 |
Web of ScienceAbstract
Ants and termites are the most abundant animals on earth. Their ecological success is attributed to their social life. They live in colonies consisting of few reproducing individuals, while the large majority of colony members (workers/ soldiers) forego reproduction at least temporarilly. Despite their apparent resemblance in social organisation, both groups evolved social life independently. ...
Abstract
Ants and termites are the most abundant animals on earth. Their ecological success is attributed to their social life. They live in colonies consisting of few reproducing individuals, while the large majority of colony members (workers/ soldiers) forego reproduction at least temporarilly. Despite their apparent resemblance in social organisation, both groups evolved social life independently. Termites are basically social cockroaches, while ants evolved from predatory wasps. In this review, I will concentrate on termites with an ancestral life type, the wood-dwelling termites, to compare them with ants. Their different ancestries provided both groups with different life history pre-adaptations for social evolution. Like their closest relatives, the woodroaches, wood-dwelling termites live inside their food, a piece of wood. Thus, intensive costly food provisioning of their young is not necessary, especially as young instars are rather independent due to their hemimetabolous development. In contrast, ants are progressive food provisioners which have to care intensively for their helpless brood. Corresponding to the precocial - altricial analogy, helping by workers is selected in ants, while new evidence suggests that wood-dwelling termite workers are less engaged in brood care. Rather they seem to stay in the nest because there is generally low selection for dispersal. The nest presents a safe haven with no local resource competition as long as food is abundant ( which is generally the case), while founding a new colony is very risky. Despite these differences between ants and termites, their common dwelling life style resulted in convergent evolution, especially winglessness, that probably accounts for the striking similarity between both groups. In ants, all workers are wingless and winglessness in sexuals evolved in several taxa as a derived trait. In wood-dwelling termites, workers are by default wingless as they are immatures. These immatures can develop into winged sexuals that disperse and found a new nest or into neotenic replacement reproductives that inherit the natal colony. Depending on the worker instar from which the latter develop, the neotenic reproductives are either apterous or brachypterous, but never winged. I propose that this wing polyphenism might present a basis for the evolution of social life in termites.
Metadata last modified: 19 Dec 2024 13:14
Altmetric