Abstract
A prospective monocentre randomized parallel-group Phase III trial was performed to investigate whether primary transurethral resection (TUR) with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced Fluorescence diagnosis (FD) allows for a more thorough TUR of superficial Bladder Carcinoma compared to conventional white light (WL). Evaluation of residual tumor rate and recurrence free survival were defined as the two ...
Abstract
A prospective monocentre randomized parallel-group Phase III trial was performed to investigate whether primary transurethral resection (TUR) with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced Fluorescence diagnosis (FD) allows for a more thorough TUR of superficial Bladder Carcinoma compared to conventional white light (WL). Evaluation of residual tumor rate and recurrence free survival were defined as the two primary study endpoints. The residual tumor rate was 25.2% in the WL arm (n=103) vs.4.5% in the (n=88) FD arm (p<0.0001). Median follow up of the patients in the WL arm was 42 months (range 25-61) compared to 43 (range 24-61) in the FD arm. Recurrence free,survival in the fluorescence diagnosis group was 90.9%,90.9% und 85% after 12,24 and 48 months compared with 78.6%,69.9% und 60.7%, respectively, in the white light group (p=0.0005). This superiority proved to be independent of risk group. The adjusted hazard ratio of fluorescence diagnosis versus white light transurethral resection was 0.29 (95% Cl: [0.15;0.56]). ALA induced FD is statistically significantly superior to conventional WLTUR with respect to both residual tumor rate and recurrence-free survival. The differences in RFS imply that FD offers a clinically relevant procedure to reduce the number of tumor recurrences.
Altmetric