Abstract
Objective To determine whether the presence of anhydramnios significantly influences the sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) compared to a matched cohort with normal amniotic fluid volume. Methods The study sample of this retrospective case-control study consisted of 114 pregnant women who presented to a Tertiary Perinatal Clinic between 2015 and 2020. 57 of them presented with an ...
Abstract
Objective To determine whether the presence of anhydramnios significantly influences the sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) compared to a matched cohort with normal amniotic fluid volume. Methods The study sample of this retrospective case-control study consisted of 114 pregnant women who presented to a Tertiary Perinatal Clinic between 2015 and 2020. 57 of them presented with an anhydramnios and a matched cohort of 57 women with normal amniotic fluid volume. At time of admission, gestational age varied between 22 + 4 and 42 + 6 weeks of pregnancy. All women underwent detailed ultrasound assessment for EFW and amniotic fluid index. To determine EFW Hadlock's estimation formula I was used which is based on measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). The EFW was compared with the weight at delivery. The maximum time interval between measurement and delivery was 5 days. Results There was neither a significant difference between the case and control group with regard to gestational age at ultrasound in days (median 249 days and 246 days, p = 0.97), nor to gestational age at birth (median 249 days and 247 days, p = 0.98). Concerning the newborns parameters, the body length at birth was not significantly different between the case and control group in centimeters (cm) (median 47 cm and 47 cm, p = 0.79). EFW in gram (g) was lower than birth weight in both groups and did not differ significantly between case and control group (estimated weight median 2247 g and 2421 g, p = 0.46; birth weight median 2440 g and 2475 g, p = 0.47). The difference between EFW and birth weight in percent (%) did not differ between the case and control group (median - 3.9% and - 5.6%, p = 0.70). The maternal parameters showed that the patients in the case group were younger (median 31 years and 38 years p = 0.20) and had a significantly higher body mass index (BMI) (median 27.3 kg/m(2) vs 22.0 kg/m(2), < 0.001) compared to the control group. Conclusion Our study shows for the first time that EFW in women with anhydramnios can be determined sonographically just as accurately as in a matched cohort with normal amniotic fluid volume. A reliable estimation of fetal weight is crucial for optimal assessment of the newborns prognosis and counseling of the parents especially when advising women in the early weeks of pregnancy at the limit of viability.
Altmetric