Direkt zum Inhalt

Ettl, Tobias ; Meier, Johannes K. ; Kummer, Peter ; Pohl, Fabian ; Gerken, Michael ; Reichert, Torsten E. ; Bohr, Christopher ; Vester, Sarah

Swallowing and Speaking Evaluation After Resection and Reconstruction Versus Definite Radiochemotherapy for (Sub)total Tongue Cancer

Ettl, Tobias , Meier, Johannes K., Kummer, Peter, Pohl, Fabian, Gerken, Michael, Reichert, Torsten E., Bohr, Christopher und Vester, Sarah (2025) Swallowing and Speaking Evaluation After Resection and Reconstruction Versus Definite Radiochemotherapy for (Sub)total Tongue Cancer. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open 13 (3), e6533.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 27 Mrz 2025 14:47
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.76478


Zusammenfassung

Background: In very advanced tongue cancer, definite radiochemotherapy (RCHT) is often preferred over total or near total glossectomy due to organ preservation and functionality, particularly swallowing. Methods: This retrospective study compares the functionality and survival of 10 patients with very advanced tongue cancer who received (sub)total glossectomy with prior or adjuvant RCHT and ...

Background: In very advanced tongue cancer, definite radiochemotherapy (RCHT)
is often preferred over total or near total glossectomy due to organ preservation
and functionality, particularly swallowing.
Methods: This retrospective study compares the functionality and survival of 10
patients with very advanced tongue cancer who received (sub)total glossectomy with
prior or adjuvant RCHT and reconstruction by a musculocutaneous anterolateral
thigh flap. All 10 patients had comparable tongue carcinomas treated by definite
RCHT. Airway protection and swallow efficiency were evaluated by fiberoptic endoscopic
evaluation of swallowing and graded using the Rosenbek Penetration and
Aspiration Scale (PAS) and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRS).
Results: Of 10 surgical patients, 7 were completely oralized after a mean of 17 days.
For surgical patients, PAS scores swallowing saliva (mean 1.6 versus 2.9, P = 0.04) as
well as vallecula (mean 4.0 versus 2.9, P = 0.05) and piriform sinus (mean 3.5 versus
2.5, P = 0.05) YPRS scores for saliva were significantly lower compared with definite
RCHT. Irrespective of treatment, age older than 65 years (YPRS sinus piriformis
H2O 3.4 versus 2.5, P = 0.47), body mass index less than 20 kg/m2 (PAS Jelly 4.7 versus
2.2, P = 0.015, YPRS sinus piriformis 4.0 versus 2.7, P = 0.028), and Karnovsky
index less than 80 (PAS saliva 2.8 versus 1.6, P = 0.049) were associated with worse
swallowing. Speech was intelligible in 80% of patients of both groups. Overall survival
did not differ between the surgical group and definite RCHT.
Conclusions: Patients after (sub)total glossectomy with RCHT and adequate reconstruction
with a musculocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap show equal or even better
swallowing compared with patients after definite RCHT for advanced tongue cancer.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Verlag:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS) - Global Open
Band:13
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:3
Seitenbereich:e6533
Datum14 März 2025
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1097/GOX.0000000000006533DOI
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-764783
Dokumenten-ID76478

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben