Direkt zum Inhalt

Paddenberg-Schubert, Eva ; Midlej, Kareem ; Krohn, Sebastian ; Lone, Iqbal M. ; Zohud, Osayd ; Awadi, Obaida ; Masarwa, Samir ; Kirschneck, Christian ; Watted, Nezar ; Proff, Peter ; Iraqi, Fuad A.

Hierarchical clustering analysis & machine learning models for diagnosing skeletal classes I and II in German patients

Paddenberg-Schubert, Eva , Midlej, Kareem, Krohn, Sebastian, Lone, Iqbal M., Zohud, Osayd, Awadi, Obaida, Masarwa, Samir, Kirschneck, Christian, Watted, Nezar, Proff, Peter und Iraqi, Fuad A. (2025) Hierarchical clustering analysis & machine learning models for diagnosing skeletal classes I and II in German patients. BMC Oral Health 25 (1).

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 04 Jun 2025 05:07
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.76755


Zusammenfassung

Background Classification is one of the most common tasks in artificial intelligence (AI) driven fields in dentistry and orthodontics. The AI abilities can significantly improve the orthodontist’s critical mission to diagnose and treat patients precisely, promptly, and efficiently. Therefore, this study aims to develop a machine-learning model to classify German orthodontic patients as skeletal ...

Background
Classification is one of the most common tasks in artificial intelligence (AI) driven fields in dentistry and orthodontics. The AI abilities can significantly improve the orthodontist’s critical mission to diagnose and treat patients precisely, promptly, and efficiently. Therefore, this study aims to develop a machine-learning model to classify German orthodontic patients as skeletal class I or II based on minimal cephalometric parameters. Eventually, clustering analysis was done to understand the differences between clusters within the same or different skeletal classes.
Methods
A total of 556 German orthodontic patients were classified into skeletal class I (n = 210) and II (n = 346) using the individualized ANB. Hierarchical clustering analysis used the Euclidean distances between data points and Ward’s minimum variance method. Six machine learning models (random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), classification and regression trees (CART), and General Linear Model (GLM)) were evaluated considering their accuracy, reliability, sensitivity, and specificity in diagnosing skeletal class I and II.
Results
The clustering analysis results showed the power of this tool to cluster the results into two–three clusters that interestingly varied significantly in many cephalometric parameters, including NL-ML angle, NL-NSL angle, PFH/AFH ratio, gonial angle, SNB, Go-Me (mm), Wits appraisal, ML-NSL, and part of the dental parameters. The CART model achieved 100% accuracy by considering all cephalometric and demographic variables, while the KNN model performed well with three input parameters (ANB, Wits, SNB) only.
Conclusions
The KNN model with three key variables demonstrated sufficient accuracy for classifying skeletal classes I and II, supporting efficient and still personalized orthodontic diagnostics and treatment planning. Further studies with balanced sample sizes are needed for validation.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftBMC Oral Health
Verlag:Springer
Band:25
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:1
Datum15 Mai 2025
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Kieferorthopädie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1186/s12903-025-06063-6DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsSkeletal malocclusion, Cephalometric analysis, Machine learning, Personalized orthodontics
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenZum Teil
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-767553
Dokumenten-ID76755

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben