| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 219kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Consent capital: From Romantasy’s “Alpha male archetypes” toward a new cultural theory in post-digital storytelling
Niebling, Laura (2025) Consent capital: From Romantasy’s “Alpha male archetypes” toward a new cultural theory in post-digital storytelling. New Media & Society.Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 07 Nov 2025 15:45
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.78113
Zusammenfassung
The article introduces the concept of “consent capital” to analyze how writing and reading romantasy, a leading book genre on contemporary bookish platforms often criticized for its young female communities and “trivial” nature, has become a site for political discourse. Drawing on feminist research on romance since the 1980s, and theories on consent culture and cultural capital, the analysis ...
The article introduces the concept of “consent capital” to analyze how writing and reading romantasy, a leading book genre on contemporary bookish platforms often criticized for its young female communities and “trivial” nature, has become a site for political discourse. Drawing on feminist research on romance since the 1980s, and theories on consent culture and cultural capital, the analysis traces romantasy’s role in the post-digital storytelling of body politics, particularly after 2016. Through a comparative analysis of contemporary romantasy series, exemplified by a case study on Rebecca Yarros’s Empyrean series and a focus on “alpha male archetypes,” the article argues that notions of consent, bodily autonomy, and trauma have been transformed into a form of cultural capital, which is actively practiced, but also discussed and aesthetically reflected upon on social media platforms. In post-digital storytelling, it informs cultural value debates and commodification strategies on “sides” like BookTok, where romantasy’s fictional renegotiations of consent capital intersect with the current political, legal and cultural debates on “consent” in countries in the “Global North”.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | New Media & Society | ||||
| Verlag: | Sage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datum | 27 September 2025 | ||||
| Institutionen | Nicht ausgewählt | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | Archetype, Bookish Platforms, BookTok, consent capital, memes, reading industry, romantasy | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 900 Geschichte und Geografie > 990 Geschichte der übrigen Welt | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-781137 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 78113 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik