Direkt zum Inhalt

Baertl, Susanne ; Lang, Siegmund ; Henssler, Leopold ; Huber, Lorenz ; Rupp, Markus ; Hanses, Frank ; Alt, Volker

Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery

Baertl, Susanne , Lang, Siegmund , Henssler, Leopold , Huber, Lorenz, Rupp, Markus , Hanses, Frank und Alt, Volker (2025) Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Die Unfallchirurgie.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 09 Dez 2025 05:37
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.78300


Zusammenfassung

Background Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Until 2024, no uniform nationwide guidelines existed in Germany regarding the optimal choice, dosage, and duration of perioperative antibiotic use. Methods A nationwide survey was conducted among 36 German trauma and orthopedic centers to assess current practices of antibiotic ...

Background
Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Until 2024, no uniform nationwide guidelines existed in Germany regarding the optimal choice, dosage, and duration of perioperative antibiotic use.
Methods
A nationwide survey was conducted among 36 German trauma and orthopedic centers to assess current practices of antibiotic prophylaxis in closed and open fractures, primary arthroplasty, and posterior spinal instrumentation. The questionnaire included the choice and duration of systemic antibiotics, empirical strategies, and the use of local antibiotics such as vancomycin powder. The current practice was then compared to the recently published S3-guideline “Perioperative and periinterventional antibiotic prophylaxis” (AWMF 067-009; https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/067-009) in Germany.
Results
For closed fractures, 94.4% of hospitals used first- or second-generation cephalosporins, with single-shot administration. In Gustilo–Anderson (GA) type I open fractures, cefuroxime and ampicillin/sulbactam were each used by 13 hospitals (36.1%), with 63.9% applying a single-shot regimen. In type III open fractures, piperacillin/tazobactam was most common (33.3%), and 72 h prophylaxis was most frequently reported in both type II and III fractures (38.9%). In distal phalanx fractures, 94.4% of hospitals administered systemic antibiotics despite guideline recommendations to omit prophylaxis when no osteosynthesis is required. In arthroplasty, cefuroxime (50.0%) and cefazolin (41.7%) predominated, with single-shot use in 94.4%. In spine surgery, 38.9% additionally used local vancomycin powder.
Conclusion
While guideline adherence is high in routine indications, significant deviations remain in open fractures and distal phalanx fractures of the fingers. Extended prophylaxis beyond 72 h in GA type III fractures and the frequent use of antibiotics in distal phalanx injuries contrast with current recommendations. Stronger implementation of national standards is essential to reduce overtreatment and support antimicrobial stewardship.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftDie Unfallchirurgie
Verlag:Springer
Datum5 Dezember 2025
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie
Medizin > Abteilung für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektiologie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1007/s00113-025-01659-7DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsAntibiotic prophylaxis · Empirical antibiotic therapy · Local antibiotic therapy · Fracture-related infection · Practice guideline
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenZum Teil
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-783007
Dokumenten-ID78300

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben