| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 917kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery
Baertl, Susanne
, Lang, Siegmund
, Henssler, Leopold
, Huber, Lorenz, Rupp, Markus
, Hanses, Frank
und Alt, Volker
(2025)
Antibiotic prophylaxis in trauma and orthopedic surgery.
Die Unfallchirurgie.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 09 Dez 2025 05:37
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.78300
Zusammenfassung
Background Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Until 2024, no uniform nationwide guidelines existed in Germany regarding the optimal choice, dosage, and duration of perioperative antibiotic use. Methods A nationwide survey was conducted among 36 German trauma and orthopedic centers to assess current practices of antibiotic ...
Background
Antibiotic prophylaxis is a key component of infection prevention in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Until 2024, no uniform nationwide guidelines existed in Germany regarding the optimal choice, dosage, and duration of perioperative antibiotic use.
Methods
A nationwide survey was conducted among 36 German trauma and orthopedic centers to assess current practices of antibiotic prophylaxis in closed and open fractures, primary arthroplasty, and posterior spinal instrumentation. The questionnaire included the choice and duration of systemic antibiotics, empirical strategies, and the use of local antibiotics such as vancomycin powder. The current practice was then compared to the recently published S3-guideline “Perioperative and periinterventional antibiotic prophylaxis” (AWMF 067-009; https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/067-009) in Germany.
Results
For closed fractures, 94.4% of hospitals used first- or second-generation cephalosporins, with single-shot administration. In Gustilo–Anderson (GA) type I open fractures, cefuroxime and ampicillin/sulbactam were each used by 13 hospitals (36.1%), with 63.9% applying a single-shot regimen. In type III open fractures, piperacillin/tazobactam was most common (33.3%), and 72 h prophylaxis was most frequently reported in both type II and III fractures (38.9%). In distal phalanx fractures, 94.4% of hospitals administered systemic antibiotics despite guideline recommendations to omit prophylaxis when no osteosynthesis is required. In arthroplasty, cefuroxime (50.0%) and cefazolin (41.7%) predominated, with single-shot use in 94.4%. In spine surgery, 38.9% additionally used local vancomycin powder.
Conclusion
While guideline adherence is high in routine indications, significant deviations remain in open fractures and distal phalanx fractures of the fingers. Extended prophylaxis beyond 72 h in GA type III fractures and the frequent use of antibiotics in distal phalanx injuries contrast with current recommendations. Stronger implementation of national standards is essential to reduce overtreatment and support antimicrobial stewardship.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Die Unfallchirurgie | ||||
| Verlag: | Springer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datum | 5 Dezember 2025 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie Medizin > Abteilung für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektiologie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | Antibiotic prophylaxis · Empirical antibiotic therapy · Local antibiotic therapy · Fracture-related infection · Practice guideline | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Zum Teil | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-783007 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 78300 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik