| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 1MB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Underutilization of CRS, HIPEC & PIPAC in peritoneal mesothelioma across a German nationwide cohort
Müller, Veronika
, Hornung, Matthias
, Werner, Jens
, Schlitt, Hans Jürgen und Acs, Miklos
(2026)
Underutilization of CRS, HIPEC & PIPAC in peritoneal mesothelioma across a German nationwide cohort.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology 24 (1).
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 25 Feb 2026 10:32
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.78756
Zusammenfassung
This retrospective cohort study utilizes a nationwide database to provide information about the epidemiology and surgical treatment practices of peritoneal mesothelioma in Germany over the years 2019 to 2024. Data collected by the German Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) was examined by age, sex, treatment with HIPEC, PIPAC, or peritonectomy, ICU stay, type of hospital, and ...
This retrospective cohort study utilizes a nationwide database to provide information about the epidemiology and surgical treatment practices of peritoneal mesothelioma in Germany over the years 2019 to 2024.
Data collected by the German Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) was examined by age, sex, treatment with HIPEC, PIPAC, or peritonectomy, ICU stay, type of hospital, and duration of stay. Additionally, the Patient Clinical Complexity Level (PCCL) - ranging from 0 to 6 - was analyzed.
In total 3394 patients with peritoneal mesothelioma were recorded during the years 2019 to 2024 in Germany, with an average annual incidence of 0.68 per 100,000 inhabitants. The mean duration of hospital stay was 9 days. The median PCCL was 1. The median patient age group was 65 to 74. 16% of patients had an ICU stay. Most patients were treated at maximum care hospitals with over 1000 beds. Only 9% of patients received HIPEC treatment. 15% received some form of peritonectomy. PIPAC was performed on only 5% of the patients. In total, considering that patients can be coded with multiple procedures, 20% of all patients received surgical therapy.
It was demonstrated that only a small percentage of patients received HIPEC, CRS, or PIPAC. This shows a grave discrepancy between guideline-recommendations and actual clinical practice. Potential reasons could be a lack of consideration of these procedures or misleading economic incentives. Ultimately, the findings highlight the need for increased awareness of peritoneal mesothelioma and underscore the importance to address the aforementioned observed discrepancy.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | World Journal of Surgical Oncology | ||||
| Verlag: | Springer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band: | 24 | ||||
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 1 | ||||
| Datum | 18 Februar 2026 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Chirurgie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-787560 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 78756 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik