Direkt zum Inhalt

Stolz, Wilhelm ; Vogt, Thomas ; Braun-Falco, Otto ; Abmayr, Wolfgang ; Eckert, Fritjof ; Kaudewitz, Peter ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Bieber, Kristina ; Burg, Günther

Differentiation between lymphomas and pseudolymphomas of the skin by computerized DNA-image cytometry

Stolz, Wilhelm, Vogt, Thomas, Braun-Falco, Otto, Abmayr, Wolfgang, Eckert, Fritjof, Kaudewitz, Peter, Vieluf, Dieter, Bieber, Kristina und Burg, Günther (1990) Differentiation between lymphomas and pseudolymphomas of the skin by computerized DNA-image cytometry. The Journal of investigative dermatology 94 (2), S. 254-260.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 05 Aug 2009 14:00
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.8521


Zusammenfassung

The histologic and immunohistologic differential diagnosis between pseudolymphomas (PL) and malignant lymphomas (ML) of the skin can be difficult. Since DNA cytometry has been found to be of both diagnostic and prognostic value in various neoplasms, its ability to discriminate between ML and PL in Feulgen-stained imprints of 17 PL and 49 ML skin biopsies was examined by high-resolution image ...

The histologic and immunohistologic differential diagnosis between pseudolymphomas (PL) and malignant lymphomas (ML) of the skin can be difficult. Since DNA cytometry has been found to be of both diagnostic and prognostic value in various neoplasms, its ability to discriminate between ML and PL in Feulgen-stained imprints of 17 PL and 49 ML skin biopsies was examined by high-resolution image analysis. The reliability of the following algorithms of DNA distribution was evaluated: 1) 2cDI (2c-deviation index), which reflects the variation of the nuclear DNA values around the diploid DNA peak; 2) percentage of cells having a DNA value greater than or equal to 5c (5cER; 5c-exceeding rate); 3) percentage of cells presenting with a DNA value greater than or equal to 4c (4cER). A 2cDI of 0.1 was found to be the most reliable marker for the differentiation between PL and ML. On the basis of this feature, 16 of 17 cases of PL and 46 of 49 cases of ML were correctly classified. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of this feature were 94%. A 5cER greater than or equal to 1% had a specificity of 100%, but the sensitivity was only 43%. For the 4cER, a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 94% were found. In conclusion, the calculation of the 2cDI and the 5cER based on high-resolution image analysis provided additional helpful diagnostic features, and therefore should be included as a diagnostic tool. If the 5cER is at least 1%, the diagnosis of a ML can be confirmed with a specificity of 100%.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftThe Journal of investigative dermatology
Band:94
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:2
Seitenbereich:S. 254-260
Datum1990
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
2405067PubMed-ID
10.1111/1523-1747.ep12874602DOI
Klassifikation
NotationArt
Cytophotometry/methodsMESH
DNA/analysisMESH
Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedMESH
Diagnosis, DifferentialMESH
HumansMESH
Lymphoma/diagnosisMESH
Skin Neoplasms/diagnosisMESH
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenNein
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-85211
Dokumenten-ID8521

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben