Direkt zum Inhalt

Stolz, Wilhelm ; Vogt, Thomas ; Braun-Falco, Otto ; Abmayr, Wolfgang ; Eckert, Fritjof ; Kaudewitz, Peter ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Bieber, Kristina ; Burg, Günther

Differentiation between lymphomas and pseudolymphomas of the skin by computerized DNA-image cytometry

Stolz, Wilhelm, Vogt, Thomas, Braun-Falco, Otto, Abmayr, Wolfgang, Eckert, Fritjof, Kaudewitz, Peter, Vieluf, Dieter, Bieber, Kristina and Burg, Günther (1990) Differentiation between lymphomas and pseudolymphomas of the skin by computerized DNA-image cytometry. The Journal of investigative dermatology 94 (2), pp. 254-260.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 05 Aug 2009 14:00
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.8521


Abstract

The histologic and immunohistologic differential diagnosis between pseudolymphomas (PL) and malignant lymphomas (ML) of the skin can be difficult. Since DNA cytometry has been found to be of both diagnostic and prognostic value in various neoplasms, its ability to discriminate between ML and PL in Feulgen-stained imprints of 17 PL and 49 ML skin biopsies was examined by high-resolution image ...

The histologic and immunohistologic differential diagnosis between pseudolymphomas (PL) and malignant lymphomas (ML) of the skin can be difficult. Since DNA cytometry has been found to be of both diagnostic and prognostic value in various neoplasms, its ability to discriminate between ML and PL in Feulgen-stained imprints of 17 PL and 49 ML skin biopsies was examined by high-resolution image analysis. The reliability of the following algorithms of DNA distribution was evaluated: 1) 2cDI (2c-deviation index), which reflects the variation of the nuclear DNA values around the diploid DNA peak; 2) percentage of cells having a DNA value greater than or equal to 5c (5cER; 5c-exceeding rate); 3) percentage of cells presenting with a DNA value greater than or equal to 4c (4cER). A 2cDI of 0.1 was found to be the most reliable marker for the differentiation between PL and ML. On the basis of this feature, 16 of 17 cases of PL and 46 of 49 cases of ML were correctly classified. The sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of this feature were 94%. A 5cER greater than or equal to 1% had a specificity of 100%, but the sensitivity was only 43%. For the 4cER, a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 94% were found. In conclusion, the calculation of the 2cDI and the 5cER based on high-resolution image analysis provided additional helpful diagnostic features, and therefore should be included as a diagnostic tool. If the 5cER is at least 1%, the diagnosis of a ML can be confirmed with a specificity of 100%.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleThe Journal of investigative dermatology
Volume:94
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:2
Page Range:pp. 254-260
Date1990
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Identification Number
ValueType
2405067PubMed ID
10.1111/1523-1747.ep12874602DOI
Classification
NotationType
Cytophotometry/methodsMESH
DNA/analysisMESH
Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedMESH
Diagnosis, DifferentialMESH
HumansMESH
Lymphoma/diagnosisMESH
Skin Neoplasms/diagnosisMESH
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgNo
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-85211
Item ID8521

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben