Direkt zum Inhalt

Schmalz, Gottfried

Ein Vergleich zweier Eluationsverfahren zur biologischen Materialprufung

Schmalz, Gottfried (1978) Ein Vergleich zweier Eluationsverfahren zur biologischen Materialprufung. Deutsche zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 33 (12), S. 850-855.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 16 Nov 2009 10:33
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.9823


Zusammenfassung

The possibility of separating the eluate and the actual biologic test for determining tissue tolerance was studied using two cements containing copper and two cements without copper. Both the materials and the two eluates obtained according to the different procedures were tested immediately. Distilled water was added to one sample of the material, and the mixture was placed in an autoclave for ...

The possibility of separating the eluate and the actual biologic test for determining tissue tolerance was studied using two cements containing copper and two cements without copper. Both the materials and the two eluates obtained according to the different procedures were tested immediately. Distilled water was added to one sample of the material, and the mixture was placed in an autoclave for one hour. A second sample was leached in nutrient solution for 24 hours at 37 C. Uniform results were obtained with the copper-free material. Results with the material containing copper however varied; the results of the eluate obtained after one hour in the autoclave were different from the results obtained after 24 hours in the nutrient solution or after direct testing. The test results for the last two procedures were similar. Comparison of the two elution methods indicates that extraction in physiologic nutrient solution is better than the autoclave method using distilled water.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftDeutsche zahnärztliche Zeitschrift
Band:33
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:12
Seitenbereich:S. 850-855
Datum1978
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
365516PubMed-ID
Klassifikation
NotationArt
Biocompatible MaterialsMESH
Biological AssayMESH
CopperMESH
Dental Cements/standardsMESH
Drug ToleranceMESH
Foreign-Body ReactionMESH
HumansMESH
SiliconesMESH
Zinc Phosphate Cement/standardsMESH
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-98233
Dokumenten-ID9823

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben