Incidence and clinical importance of perioperative histamine release: randomised study of volume loading and antihistamines after induction of anaesthesia

Lorenz, Wilfried and Duda, D. and Dick, W. and Sitter, H. and Doenicke, A. and Black, A. and Weber, Doris and Menke, H. and Stinner, B. and Junginger, T. and Trial Group, Mainz/Marburg (1994) Incidence and clinical importance of perioperative histamine release: randomised study of volume loading and antihistamines after induction of anaesthesia. Lancet (London) 343 (8903), pp. 933-940.

[img]
Preview

PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
1077Kb

Abstract

Although histamine release is recognised as a common event during anaesthesia and surgery, few clinicians judge the resultant cardiorespiratory disturbances serious enough to warrant prophylaxis with antihistamines. We have assessed the incidence and importance of histamine release in a randomised 2 x 2 factorial study. 240 patients representing a routine throughput of major general surgery were studied during a standardised induction of anaesthesia and preoperative loading of the circulation with either Ringer solution or Haemaccel-35, with or without antihistamine prophylaxis with dimetindene (H1) plus cimetidine (H2). Cardiorespiratory disturbances were graded as detectable, clinically relevant, or life-threatening from observers' records of the anaesthesia and the actions taken by the anaesthetists. Disturbances that were accompanied by significant rises in plasma histamine were further designated histamine-related, and those that were not were designated histamine-unrelated. Anaesthetists, observers, and designators were blinded to whether or not the patients had received antihistamines and to which solution was used for circulatory volume loading. Clinically relevant or life-threatening histamine-related disturbances occurred in 8% of the patients who after induction of anaesthesia received Ringer without antihistamines, in 26% of those who received Haemaccel without antihistamines, and in 2% or less of those who received antihistamines (p < or = 0.0001). There were 4 life-threatening histamine-related disturbances, all in patients who received Haemaccel without antihistamines (p < 0.01). Histamine-unrelated disturbances occurred in 16% overall, with no obvious effect of Haemaccel or antihistamines. The histamine-related disturbances under anaesthesia were remarkable for their severity (even with small rises in histamine concentrations), for the prevalence of bradycardia, and for the absence of skin signs. Their likelihood and severity were increased in patients with tumours. The results of the trial make a case for routine prophylaxis with antihistamines as part of anaesthetic management.

Item Type:Article
Institutions: Medicine > Zentren des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg > Tumorzentrum e.V.
Identification Number:
ValueType
7519707PubMed ID
Classification:
NotationType
AdolescentMESH
AdultMESH
AgedMESH
Aged, 80 and overMESH
Anesthesia, GeneralMESH
Cimetidine/therapeutic useMESH
Dimethindene/therapeutic useMESH
Double-Blind MethodMESH
FemaleMESH
Hemodynamics/drug effectsMESH
Histamine/bloodMESH
Histamine Release/drug effectsMESH
HumansMESH
Intraoperative Complications/prevention & controlMESH
MaleMESH
Middle AgedMESH
Polygeline/therapeutic useMESH
Subjects:600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of Regensburg:Unknown
Owner:Universitätsbibliothek Regensburg
Deposited On:16 Aug 2011 14:01
Last Modified:16 Aug 2011 14:01
Item ID:21752
Export bibliographical data
Literature of the same author
plusin this repository
plusat BASE
plusat Google Scholar
plusat Scirus
plusat PubMed

at PubMed

Bookmark
Owner Only: item control page