| PDF - Angenommene Version Manuskript (112kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 1a (194kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 1b (125kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 1c (1MB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 1d (486kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 2a (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 2b (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 2c (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 2d (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 2e (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 2f (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 3a (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 3b (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 3c (699kB) | |
| Bild (TIFF) Abb. 3d (699kB) | |
![[img]](https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) | PDF - Veröffentlichte Version Verlags-PDF (441kB) - Nur für Mitarbeiter des Archivs |
- DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:
- 10.5283/epub.23400
Zusammenfassung
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For several years three-dimensional treatment-planning systems have used pencil beam algorithms in the calculation of electron fields. Nowadays, exact Monte Carlo methods are commercially available, showing good correspondence to experimental results. Clinical examples are investigated to find differences in the dose distribution of treatment plans, which are calculated ...
Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags
Downloadstatistik