Go to content
UR Home

The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect

Bäuml, Karl-Heinz and Dobler, Ina-Maria (2015) The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41, pp. 246-253.

Full text not available from this repository.

at publisher (via DOI)


Abstract

Depending on the degree to which the original study context is accessible, selective memory retrieval can be detrimental or beneficial for the recall of other memories (Baeuml & Samenieh, 2012). Prior work has shown that the detrimental effect of memory retrieval is typically recall specific and does not arise after restudy trials, whereas recall specificity of the beneficial effect has not been ...

plus


Export bibliographical data



Item type:Article
Date:2015
Institutions:Psychology and Pedagogy > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie IV (Entwicklungs- und Kognitionspsychologie) - Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Bäuml
Identification Number:
ValueType
10.1037/xlm0000008DOI
Keywords:context; forgetting; reactivation; restudy; retrieval
Dewey Decimal Classification:100 Philosophy & psychology > 150 Psychology
Status:Published
Refereed:Yes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of Regensburg:Yes
Item ID:29569
Owner only: item control page
  1. Homepage UR

University Library

Publication Server

Contact:

Publishing: oa@ur.de

Dissertations: dissertationen@ur.de

Research data: daten@ur.de

Contact persons