| Download ( PDF | 174kB) |
The Planning and Control Model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects
Thomaschke, Roland
, Hopkins, Brian und Miall, Christopher
(2012)
The Planning and Control Model (PCM) of motorvisual priming: Reconciling motorvisual impairment and facilitation effects.
Psychological Review 119 (2), S. 388-407.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 20 Mrz 2014 11:40
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.29642
Zusammenfassung
Previous research on dual-tasks has shown that, under some circumstances, actions impair the perception of action-consistent stimuli, whereas, under other conditions, actions facilitate the perception of action-consistent stimuli. We propose a new model to reconcile these contrasting findings. The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming proposes that action planning binds ...
Previous research on dual-tasks has shown that, under some circumstances, actions impair the perception of action-consistent stimuli, whereas, under other conditions, actions facilitate the perception of action-consistent stimuli. We propose a new model to reconcile these contrasting findings. The planning and control model (PCM) of motorvisual priming proposes that action planning binds categorical representations of action features so that their availability for perceptual processing is inhibited. Thus, the perception of categorically action-consistent stimuli is impaired during action planning. Movement control processes, on the other hand, integrate multi-sensory spatial information about the movement and, therefore, facilitate perceptual processing of spatially movement-consistent stimuli. We show that the PCM is consistent with a wider range of empirical data than previous models on motorvisual priming. Furthermore, the model yields previously untested empirical predictions. We also discuss how the PCM relates to motorvisual research paradigms other than dual-tasks.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Psychological Review | ||||
| Verlag: | AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | WASHINGTON | ||||
| Band: | 119 | ||||
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 2 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | S. 388-407 | ||||
| Datum | April 2012 | ||||
| Institutionen | Humanwissenschaften > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II (Allgemeine und Angewandte Psychologie) - Prof. Dr. Gesine Dreisbach | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | RESPONSE-COMPATIBLE STIMULI; MULLER-LYER-ILLUSION; SEPARATE VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS; COMMON ATTENTIONAL MECHANISM; COORDINATE SPATIAL RELATIONS; MANUAL AIMING MOVEMENTS; CHANGING OBJECT SIZE; S-R COMPATIBILITY; PREHENSION MOVEMENTS; TIME-COURSE; dual-tasks; motorvisual; action planning; movement control | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Zum Teil | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-296421 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 29642 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik