Oxaliplatin-based versus irinotecan-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with peritoneal metastasis from appendiceal and colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

URN to cite this document:

urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-309330 Copy

DOI to cite this document:

10.5283/epub.30933 Copy

Glockzin, Gabriel ; Gerken, Michael ; Lang, Sven A. ; Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika ; Piso, Pompiliu ; Schlitt, Hans-Jürgen

Preview

PDF (334kB)

Date of publication of this fulltext: 04 Nov 2014 17:26

---

Alternative links to fulltext:DOIPublisher

---

---

Details

Item type:	Article
Open Access Type:	Gold (with APC)
Journal or Publication Title:	BMC Cancer
Publisher:	BMC
Volume:	14
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:	807
Date:	4 November 2014
Institutions:	Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Chirurgie
Identification Number:	Value Type 10.1186/1471-2407-14-807 DOI
Dewey Decimal Classification:	600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Status:	Published
Refereed:	Yes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of Regensburg:	Yes
Item ID:	30933

Preview

Export bibliographical data

ASCII CitationAtomBibTeXData Cite XMLDataCite XML OAIDublin CoreDublin Core (LZV)EndNoteHTML CitationJSONJSON LDMETSMODSOPENAIREOpenAPCRDF+N-TriplesRDF+N3RDF+XMLReferReference ManagerSimple MetadataXMLopenCostxMetaDissPlus

---

Abstract

Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) provide an effective treatment option for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis with encouraging survival results. Many different drug combinations and HIPEC regimens including bidirectional, i.e. synchronous intravenous and intraperitoneal, drug application have been used. However, ...

Abstract

Background
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) provide an effective treatment option for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis with encouraging survival results. Many different drug combinations and HIPEC regimens including bidirectional, i.e. synchronous intravenous and intraperitoneal, drug application have been used. However, there is still no standardization of the HIPEC regimen.

Methods
Between 05/2007 and 04/2010 190 patients underwent CRS and HIPEC at the University Hospital Regensburg. Thirty-two patients with peritoneal metastasis arising from colorectal or appendiceal cancer underwent complete macroscopic cytoreduction (CC-0/1) and bidirectional HIPEC and completed at least 3-year follow-up. Twenty patients received oxaliplatin-based (OX) and twelve patients received irinotecan-based HIPEC (IRI). Group-specific perioperative morbidity and 3-year survival has been determined.

Results
The grade 3/4 morbidity rate according to CTCAE v4 was 35.0% in the OX group vs. 33.3% in the IRI group (p =1.000). There was no perioperative mortality in both groups. Median survival was 26.8 months (95% CI 15.7-33.1 months) in the IRI group and has not yet been reached in the OX group during a median follow-up of 39.4 months. Three-year survival rates were 65.0% in the OX group vs. 41.7% in the IRI group (p =0.295).

Conclusions
The morbidity and toxicity rates of bidirectional irinotecan-based and oxaliplatin-based HIPEC are comparable. Nevertheless, in the absence of contraindications oxaliplatin-based HIPEC might be preferred due to the positive trend regarding 3-year and median survival.

---

---

Metadata last modified: 14 Oct 2022 15:43

Owner only: item control page

Download Statistics

Download Statistics

Download Statistics

Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric

Altmetric

Altmetric

Alternative Statistics (altmetrics)

More literature (via CORE)

More literature (via CORE)

More literature (via CORE)

More literature (via CORE)