Weber, Patrick, Binder, Karin 
und Krauss, Stefan
(2018)
Why can only 24% solve Bayesian reasoning problems in natural frequencies: Frequency phobia in spite of probability blindness.
[Datensatz]
![[img]](https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/style/images/fileicons/other.png) | Anderes - Daten Excel sheet inlcuding all data generated Download (25kB) |
Zusammenfassung
For more than 20 years, research has proven the beneficial effect of natural frequencies when it comes to solving Bayesian reasoning tasks (Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995). In a recent meta-analysis, McDowell & Jacobs (2017) showed that presenting a task in natural frequency format increases performance rates to 24% compared to only 4% when the same task is presented in probability format. ...
Bibliographische Daten exportieren
| Dokumentenart: | Datensatz |
|---|---|
| Datum: | 2018 |
| Institutionen: | Mathematik > Prof. Dr. Stefan Krauss |
| Stichwörter / Keywords: | Bayesian reasoning, natural frequencies, probabilities, Einstellung, tree diagram |
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation: | 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 510 Mathematik |
| Status: | Im Druck |
| Begutachtet: | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet |
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden: | Ja |
| Dokumenten-ID: | 37693 |
Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags
Downloadstatistik