Blecha, Sebastian, Brandstetter, Susanne, Dodoo-Schittko, Frank, Brandl, Magdalena, Graf, Bernhard M, Bein, Thomas and Apfelbacher, Christian
(2018)
Acceptability of a German multicentre healthcare research study: a survey of research personnels’ attitudes, experiences and work load.
BMJ Open 8 (9), e023166.
Date of publication of this fulltext: 26 Sep 2018 12:40at publisher (via DOI)
Other URL: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023166
Abstract
Objectives The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating research personnels by assessing attitudes, experiences and workload associated with the conduct of ...
Abstract
Objectives The DACAPO study as a multicentre nationwide observational healthcare research study investigates the influence of quality of care on the quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptability to the participating research personnels by assessing attitudes, experiences and workload associated with the conduct of the DACAPO study.
Design, setting and participants A prospective anonymous online survey was sent via email account to 169 participants in 65 study centres. The questionnaire included six different domains: (1) training for performing the study; (2) obtaining informed consent; (3) data collection; (4) data entry using the online documentation system; (5) opinion towards the study and (6) personal data. Descriptive data analysis was carried out.
Results A total of 78 participants took part (46%) in the survey, 75 questionnaires (44%) could be evaluated. 51% were senior medical specialists. 95% considered the time frame of the training as appropriate and the presentation was rated by 93% as good or very good. Time effort for obtaining consent, data collection and entry was considered by 41% as a burden. Support from the coordinating study centre was rated as good or very good by more than 90% of respondents. While the DACAPO study was seen as scientifically relevant by 81%, only 45% considered the study results valuable for improving patient care significantly.
Conclusion Collecting feedback on the acceptability of a large multicentre healthcare research study provided important insights. Recruitment and data acquisition was mainly performed by physicians and often regarded as additional time burden in clinical practice. Reducing the amount of data collection and simplifying data entry could facilitate the conduct of healthcare research studies and could improve motivation of researchers in intensive care medicine.
Export bibliographical data
![[img]](https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
Download Statistics