Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection

URN zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:: urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-384027
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:: 10.5283/epub.38402

Vogel, P. ; Vogel, D. H. V.

Vorschau

Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International
PDF
(2MB)

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 01 Mrz 2019 11:47

Alternative Links zum Volltext:DOI Verlag Verlag

Details

Vorschau

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Background
Cognitive errors have a considerable effect on procedural outcome. They play a major role in situational judgement and decision making, especially during cognitively demanding tasks. As such they need to be considered an important factor in medical and surgical procedures. However, whereas cognitive diagnostic errors are well known, as of yet the occurrence of errors due to cognitive heuristics may have been downplayed, underestimated, or simply been ignored during the course of surgical treatment.

Methods
All colorectal resections with anastomosis in 2015 and 2016 (n = 230) were prospectively screened for anastomotic failure (n = 17/230). During structured Morbidity and Mortality Conferences (MMC) all anastomotic failures were analyzed for both tactical and technical decisions in the pre- and intraoperative setting with potential meaning for the postoperative course, based on the London Protocol. In order to demonstrate the significance of cognitive errors in surgical procedures a structured interview with the individual surgeon was conducted including the video and photo documentation of the individual surgical procedure. The interviews were coded by independent coders who were instructed to identify defined cognitive errors. Inter-coder agreement was calculated using Krippendorff’s alpha.

Results
In 12/17 patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal surgery tactical or technical decisions with potential negative influence on anastomotic healing or the postoperative course were assessed during MMC. In 8/12 procedures a structured interview could be conducted with the operating surgeon. In 7/8 procedures cognitive errors could be identified. In particular we found Anchoring (n = 1), Availability Bias (n = 1), Commission Bias (n = 1), Overconfidence Bias (n = 1), Omission Bias (n = 2) and Sunk Costs (n = 1).

Conclusion
Cognitive errors seem to play an important role during surgical therapy of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. Consequently, we suggest cognitive errors should attract more interest in research as well as attention in clinical practice.

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

Downloadstatistik

Altmetric

Alternative Statistik (altmetrics)

Weitere Literatur (mittels CORE)

Details

Vorschau

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Downloadstatistik

Downloads

Alternative Statistik (altmetrics)

Weitere Literatur (mittels CORE)

Universitätsbibliothek