Direkt zum Inhalt

Owner only: item control page
Kreuzer, Peter M. ; Poeppl, Timm B. ; Rupprecht, Rainer ; Vielsmeier, Veronika ; Lehner, Astrid ; Langguth, Berthold ; Schecklmann, Martin

Daily high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation of bilateral temporal cortex in chronic tinnitus – a pilot study

Kreuzer, Peter M., Poeppl, Timm B. , Rupprecht, Rainer, Vielsmeier, Veronika, Lehner, Astrid, Langguth, Berthold and Schecklmann, Martin (2019) Daily high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation of bilateral temporal cortex in chronic tinnitus – a pilot study. Scientific Reports 9 (12274), pp. 1-6.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 18 Sep 2019 09:39
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.40714


Abstract

Several studies emphasized the potential of single and multiple transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) sessions to interfere with auditory cortical activity and to reduce tinnitus loudness. It was the objective of the present study to evaluate the use of high-frequency (hf) tRNS in a one-arm pilot study in patients with chronic tinnitus. Therefore, 30 patients received 10 sessions of high ...

Several studies emphasized the potential of single and multiple transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) sessions to interfere with auditory cortical activity and to reduce tinnitus loudness. It was the objective of the present study to evaluate the use of high-frequency (hf) tRNS in a one-arm pilot study in patients with chronic tinnitus. Therefore, 30 patients received 10 sessions of high frequency tRNS (100-640 Hz; 2 mA; 20 minutes) over the bilateral temporal cortex. All patients had received rTMS treatment for their tinnitus at least 3 months before tRNS. Primary outcome was treatment response (tinnitus questionnaire reduction of >= 5 points). The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01965028). Eight patients (27%) responded to tRNS. Exactly the same number of patients had responded before to rTMS, but there were only two "double responders" for both treatments. None of the secondary outcomes (tinnitus numeric rating scales, depressivity, and quality of life) was significant when results were corrected for multiple comparisons. tRNS treatment was accompanied by tolerable side effects but resulted in temporal increases in tinnitus loudness in 20% of the cases (2 drop-outs). Our trial showed that hf-tRNS is feasible for daily treatment in chronic tinnitus. However, summarizing low treatment response, increase of tinnitus loudness in 20% of patients and missing of any significant secondary outcome, the use of hf-tRNS as a general treatment for chronic tinnitus cannot be recommended at this stage. Differences in treatment responders between tRNS and rTMS highlight the need for individualized treatment procedures.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleScientific Reports
Publisher:Nature
Open Access Type:Gold (with APC)
Place of Publication:LONDON
Volume:9
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:12274
Page Range:pp. 1-6
Date22 August 2019
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde
Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1038/s41598-019-48686-0DOI
KeywordsPAIN; TRNS;
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-407146
Item ID40714

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben