| Published Version Download ( PDF | 1MB) | License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil
Schecklmann, Martin, Schmaußer, Maximilian, Klinger, Felix, Kreuzer, Peter M., Krenkel, Lars and Langguth, Berthold (2020) Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil. Scientific Reports 10 (1), p. 1644.Date of publication of this fulltext: 18 Mar 2020 09:23
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.43000
Abstract
The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and ...
The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and deeper brain areas are limited. Resting motor thresholds of the left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) were determined with the DC and the Fo8 coil in 17 healthy subjects. Coils were orientated over the corresponding motor area in an angle of 45 degrees for the hand area with the handle pointing in posterior direction and in medio-lateral direction for the leg area. Physical measurements were done with an automatic gantry table using a Gaussmeter. Resting motor threshold was higher for the leg area in contrast to the hand area and for the Fo8 in contrast to the DC coil. Muscle by coil interaction was also significant providing higher differences between leg and hand area for the Fo8 (about 27%) in contrast to the DC coil (about 15%). Magnetic field strength was higher for the DC coil in contrast to the Fo8 coil. The DC coil produces a higher magnetic field with higher depth of penetration than the figure of eight coil.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Scientific Reports | ||||
| Publisher: | Nature | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Access Type: | Gold (with APC) | ||||
| Place of Publication: | LONDON | ||||
| Volume: | 10 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 1 | ||||
| Page Range: | p. 1644 | ||||
| Date | 3 February 2020 | ||||
| Institutions | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; FRONTAL-CORTEX; STIMULATION; DEPRESSION; CONNECTIVITY; RTMS; PREDICTOR; TMS; | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-430000 | ||||
| Item ID | 43000 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics