Direkt zum Inhalt

Schecklmann, Martin ; Schmaußer, Maximilian ; Klinger, Felix ; Kreuzer, Peter M. ; Krenkel, Lars ; Langguth, Berthold

Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil

Schecklmann, Martin, Schmaußer, Maximilian, Klinger, Felix, Kreuzer, Peter M., Krenkel, Lars und Langguth, Berthold (2020) Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil. Scientific Reports 10 (1), S. 1644.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 18 Mrz 2020 09:23
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.43000


Zusammenfassung

The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and ...

The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and deeper brain areas are limited. Resting motor thresholds of the left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) were determined with the DC and the Fo8 coil in 17 healthy subjects. Coils were orientated over the corresponding motor area in an angle of 45 degrees for the hand area with the handle pointing in posterior direction and in medio-lateral direction for the leg area. Physical measurements were done with an automatic gantry table using a Gaussmeter. Resting motor threshold was higher for the leg area in contrast to the hand area and for the Fo8 in contrast to the DC coil. Muscle by coil interaction was also significant providing higher differences between leg and hand area for the Fo8 (about 27%) in contrast to the DC coil (about 15%). Magnetic field strength was higher for the DC coil in contrast to the Fo8 coil. The DC coil produces a higher magnetic field with higher depth of penetration than the figure of eight coil.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftScientific Reports
Verlag:Nature
Ort der Veröffentlichung:LONDON
Band:10
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:1
Seitenbereich:S. 1644
Datum3 Februar 2020
InstitutionenMedizin > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1038/s41598-020-58034-2DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; FRONTAL-CORTEX; STIMULATION; DEPRESSION; CONNECTIVITY; RTMS; PREDICTOR; TMS;
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-430000
Dokumenten-ID43000

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben