Direkt zum Inhalt

Stöger, Heidrun ; Balestrini, Daniel P. ; Ziegler, Albert

Key issues in professionalizing mentoring practices

Stöger, Heidrun , Balestrini, Daniel P. und Ziegler, Albert (2021) Key issues in professionalizing mentoring practices. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1483, S. 5-18.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 27 Jan 2021 10:07
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.44618


Zusammenfassung

Mentoring has experienced a tremendous upswing over the past decades, which has only recently slowed down somewhat. One possible factor explaining mentoring's popularity are numerous case studies suggesting that it is one of the most effective ways of helping individuals to develop. Meta-analyses indicating effect sizes for mentoring that are below what would theoretically be possible appear to ...

Mentoring has experienced a tremendous upswing over the past decades, which has only recently slowed down somewhat. One possible factor explaining mentoring's popularity are numerous case studies suggesting that it is one of the most effective ways of helping individuals to develop. Meta-analyses indicating effect sizes for mentoring that are below what would theoretically be possible appear to contradict the success stories, however. This circumstance raises questions about the professionalization of mentoring practices. We focus on seven key issues for future efforts at professionalizing mentoring. Key issues 1 and 2 address observation of the state of the art within formal mentoring when programs are planned and implemented: the consideration of recent research and of best practices. While both areas can overlap, they provide complementary sources of pertinent information for the professionalization of mentoring. Key issues 3-6 address the need to align mentoring activities to the specific context and goals of individual mentoring programs by observing idiographic program characteristics, mentoring dynamics, the orchestration of mentoring goals, and the provision of mentoring resources. Finally, key issue 7 highlights ongoing evaluation as the basis of the effective, continuous improvement of mentoring programs.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Verlag:Wiley
Ort der Veröffentlichung:HOBOKEN
Band:1483
Seitenbereich:S. 5-18
Datum2021
InstitutionenHumanwissenschaften > Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1111/nyas.14537DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsPROGRAMS; YOUTH; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; GENDER; EXPECT; MATTER; mentoring; STEM; best practice; talent development; research; professionalization
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-446186
Dokumenten-ID44618

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben