Direkt zum Inhalt

Owner only: item control page
Karrer, Sigrid ; Szeimies, Rolf-Markus ; Philipp-Dormston, Wolfgang G. ; Gerber, Peter A. ; Prager, Welf ; Datz, Elisabeth ; Zeman, Florian ; Müller, Karolina ; Koller, Michael

Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study

Karrer, Sigrid, Szeimies, Rolf-Markus, Philipp-Dormston, Wolfgang G., Gerber, Peter A., Prager, Welf, Datz, Elisabeth, Zeman, Florian, Müller, Karolina and Koller, Michael (2020) Repetitive Daylight Photodynamic Therapy versus Cryosurgery for Prevention of Actinic Keratoses in Photodamaged Facial Skin: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicentre Two-armed Study. Acta Dermato Venereologica 101 (1), adv00355.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 26 Feb 2021 17:19
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.44973


Abstract

Actinic keratoses are a chronic condition in ultraviolet-damaged skin, with a risk of progressing to invasive skin cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the preventive potential of field-directed repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses. A randomized trial was performed, including 58 patients with >= 5 actinic keratoses on photodamaged facial skin, who received ...

Actinic keratoses are a chronic condition in ultraviolet-damaged skin, with a risk of progressing to invasive skin cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the preventive potential of field-directed repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses. A randomized trial was performed, including 58 patients with >= 5 actinic keratoses on photodamaged facial skin, who received either 5 full-face sessions of daylight photodynamic therapy within a period of 2 years or lesion-directed cryosurgery. Primary outcome was the mean cumulative number of new actinic keratoses developed between visits 2 and 6 (visit 6 being a follow-up). This outcome was lower after daylight photodynamic therapy (7.7) compared with cryosurgery (10.2), but the difference did not reach significance (-2.5, 95% confidence interval -6.2 to 1.2; p=0.18). Several signs of photoageing (fine lines, pigmentation, roughness, erythema, sebaceous gland hyperplasia) were significantly reduced after daylight photodynamic therapy, but not after cryosurgery. Significantly less pain and fewer side-effects were reported during daylight photodynamic therapy than during cryosurgery. This study found that repetitive daylight photodynamic therapy had photo-rejuvenating effects. However, the prevention of actinic keratoses by this therapy could not be proven in a statistically reliable manner.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleActa Dermato Venereologica
Publisher:ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
Open Access Type:Gold (with APC)
Place of Publication:UPPSALA
Volume:101
Number of Issue or Book Chapter:1
Page Range:adv00355
Date14 December 2020
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Medicine > Zentren des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg > Zentrum für Klinische Studien
Identification Number
ValueType
10.2340/00015555-3717DOI
KeywordsTOPICAL METHYL AMINOLEVULINATE; EUROPEAN DERMATOLOGY FORUM; TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; FIELD; CRYOTHERAPY; STRATEGIES; GUIDELINES; PLACEBO; LESIONS; LIGHT; actinic keratoses; daylight photodynamic therapy; methyl aminolevulinate; photo-rejuvenation; skin cancer prevention; skin ageing
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-449738
Item ID44973

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben