| Published Version Download ( PDF | 2MB) |
Quantifying the hydration structure of sodium and potassium ions: taking additional steps on Jacob's Ladder
Article
Duignan, Timothy T., Schenter, Gregory K., Fulton, John L., Huthwelker, Thomas, Balasubramanian, Mahalingam, Galib, Mirza, Baer, Marcel D., Wilhelm, Jan
, Hutter, Jürg, Del Ben, Mauro, Zhao, X. S. and Mundy, Christopher J.
(2020)
Quantifying the hydration structure of sodium and potassium ions: taking additional steps on Jacob's Ladder.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 22 (19), pp. 10641-10652.
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.45957
Abstract
The ability to reproduce the experimental structure of water around the sodium and potassium ions is a key test of the quality of interaction potentials due to the central importance of these ions in a wide range of important phenomena. Here, we simulate the Na+ and K+ ions in bulk water using three density functional theory functionals: (1) the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) based ...
The ability to reproduce the experimental structure of water around the sodium and potassium ions is a key test of the quality of interaction potentials due to the central importance of these ions in a wide range of important phenomena. Here, we simulate the Na+ and K+ ions in bulk water using three density functional theory functionals: (1) the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) based dispersion corrected revised Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof functional (revPBE-D3) (2) the recently developed strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) functional (3) the random phase approximation (RPA) functional for potassium. We compare with experimental X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements to demonstrate that SCAN accurately reproduces key structural details of the hydration structure around the sodium and potassium cations, whereas revPBE-D3 fails to do so. However, we show that SCAN provides a worse description of pure water in comparison with revPBE-D3. RPA also shows an improvement for K+, but slow convergence prevents rigorous comparison. Finally, we analyse cluster energetics to show SCAN and RPA have smaller fluctuations of the mean error of ion–water cluster binding energies compared with revPBE-D3.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics | ||||
| Open Access Type | Due to SHERPA/RoMEO | ||||
| Volume | 22 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter | 19 | ||||
| Page Range | pp. 10641-10652 | ||||
| Date | 19 December 2020 | ||||
| Date of publication | 08 Jun 2021 12:40 | ||||
| Institutions | Physics > Institute of Theroretical Physics > Chair Ferdinand Evers | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 500 Science > 530 Physics | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-459573 | ||||
| Item ID | 45957 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics