| License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 PDF - Published Version (1MB) |
- URN to cite this document:
- urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-515246
- DOI to cite this document:
- 10.5283/epub.51524
Abstract
In current research, variations in retrospective passage of time judgments for long intervals are commonly attributed to differences regarding the number of experiences in these intervals or the accessibility of the respective memories. This seems to imply the assumption of a covert retrieval, where authors presume that memories from the respective interval influence the experience of time ...

Owner only: item control page