| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 544kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Is Vesicostomy Still a Contemporary Method of Managing Posterior Urethral Valves?
Hofmann, Aybike
, Haider, Maximilian, Cox, Alexander, Vauth, Franziska und Rösch, Wolfgang H.
(2022)
Is Vesicostomy Still a Contemporary Method of Managing Posterior Urethral Valves?
Children 9, S. 138.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 17 Mrz 2022 12:51
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.51935
Zusammenfassung
In boys with posterior urethral valves (PUVs) the main treatment aim is to preserve long-term bladder and renal function. To determine the effectiveness of secondary vesicostomy in boys with PUVs, the medical records of 21 patients with PUV (2010-2019), divided into two groups (group I: valve ablation; group II: secondary vesicostomy), were reviewed regarding the course of serum creatinine, renal ...
In boys with posterior urethral valves (PUVs) the main treatment aim is to preserve long-term bladder and renal function. To determine the effectiveness of secondary vesicostomy in boys with PUVs, the medical records of 21 patients with PUV (2010-2019), divided into two groups (group I: valve ablation; group II: secondary vesicostomy), were reviewed regarding the course of serum creatinine, renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrogram, urodynamics, postoperative complications, need of further surgery, and long-term solution. The median age of all patients at first follow-up was 11 (9-13) months and at last follow-up 64.5 (39.5-102.5) months. Despite a significant difference of the SWDR score (shape, wall, reflux, and diverticula) (p = 0.014), both groups showed no significant differences preoperatively. Postoperatively, serum creatinine (p = 0.024), grade of vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.003), side of upper tract dilatation (p = 0.006), side of megaureter (p = 0.004), and SWDR score (p = 0.002) were significantly decreased in group II. Postoperative urodynamic measurements showed comparable results in both groups. Stoma complications were found in three (20%) patients (group II). Eight (53.3%) patients already received a closure of the vesicostomy. Seven out of eight (87.5%) patients were able to micturate spontaneously. Vesicostomy remains a reliable treatment option for boys with PUV to improve bladder function and avoid further damage to the urinary tract.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Children | ||||
| Verlag: | MDPI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | BASEL | ||||
| Band: | 9 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | S. 138 | ||||
| Datum | 21 Januar 2022 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | URINARY-DIVERSION; ABLATION; CHILDREN; INFANTS; TRACT; BOYS; posterior urethral valves; vesicostomy; congenital urinary tract obstruction; kidney function; vesicoureteral reflux; long-term outcome | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-519350 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 51935 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik