| Published Version Download ( PDF | 544kB) | License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
Is Vesicostomy Still a Contemporary Method of Managing Posterior Urethral Valves?
Hofmann, Aybike
, Haider, Maximilian, Cox, Alexander, Vauth, Franziska and Rösch, Wolfgang H.
(2022)
Is Vesicostomy Still a Contemporary Method of Managing Posterior Urethral Valves?
Children 9, p. 138.
Date of publication of this fulltext: 17 Mar 2022 12:51
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.51935
Abstract
In boys with posterior urethral valves (PUVs) the main treatment aim is to preserve long-term bladder and renal function. To determine the effectiveness of secondary vesicostomy in boys with PUVs, the medical records of 21 patients with PUV (2010-2019), divided into two groups (group I: valve ablation; group II: secondary vesicostomy), were reviewed regarding the course of serum creatinine, renal ...
In boys with posterior urethral valves (PUVs) the main treatment aim is to preserve long-term bladder and renal function. To determine the effectiveness of secondary vesicostomy in boys with PUVs, the medical records of 21 patients with PUV (2010-2019), divided into two groups (group I: valve ablation; group II: secondary vesicostomy), were reviewed regarding the course of serum creatinine, renal ultrasound, voiding cystourethrogram, urodynamics, postoperative complications, need of further surgery, and long-term solution. The median age of all patients at first follow-up was 11 (9-13) months and at last follow-up 64.5 (39.5-102.5) months. Despite a significant difference of the SWDR score (shape, wall, reflux, and diverticula) (p = 0.014), both groups showed no significant differences preoperatively. Postoperatively, serum creatinine (p = 0.024), grade of vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.003), side of upper tract dilatation (p = 0.006), side of megaureter (p = 0.004), and SWDR score (p = 0.002) were significantly decreased in group II. Postoperative urodynamic measurements showed comparable results in both groups. Stoma complications were found in three (20%) patients (group II). Eight (53.3%) patients already received a closure of the vesicostomy. Seven out of eight (87.5%) patients were able to micturate spontaneously. Vesicostomy remains a reliable treatment option for boys with PUV to improve bladder function and avoid further damage to the urinary tract.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Children | ||||
| Publisher: | MDPI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Access Type: | Gold (with APC) | ||||
| Place of Publication: | BASEL | ||||
| Volume: | 9 | ||||
| Page Range: | p. 138 | ||||
| Date | 21 January 2022 | ||||
| Institutions | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | URINARY-DIVERSION; ABLATION; CHILDREN; INFANTS; TRACT; BOYS; posterior urethral valves; vesicostomy; congenital urinary tract obstruction; kidney function; vesicoureteral reflux; long-term outcome | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-519350 | ||||
| Item ID | 51935 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics