The Prophylactic Effect of Single vs. Dual Antibiotic-Loaded Bone Cement against Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of the German Arthroplasty Registry

URN zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:

urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-540896 Copy

DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:

10.5283/epub.54089 Copy

Szymski, Dominik ; Walter, Nike ; Krull, Paula ; Melsheimer, Oliver ; Lang, Siegmund ; Grimberg, Alexander ; Alt, Volker ; Steinbrück, Arnd ; Rupp, Markus

Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International PDF - Veröffentlichte Version (1MB)

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 18 Apr 2023 14:25

---

Alternative Links zum Volltext:DOIVerlag

---

---

Details

Dokumentenart:	Artikel
Open Access Art:	Gold (mit APC - bezahlt UR)
Höhe Gebühr (aus OpenAPC):	2135.76
Institution der Zahlung:	Regensburg U
Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift:	Antibiotics
Verlag:	MDPI
Band:	12
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:	4
Seitenbereich:	S. 732
Datum:	8 April 2023
Institutionen:	Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie
Identifikationsnummer:	Wert Typ 10.3390/antibiotics12040732 DOI
Stichwörter / Keywords:	hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, PMMA, bone cement, periprosthetic joint infection, revision, femoral neck fracture, antibiotic-loaded bone cement, antibiotics
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation:	600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin
Status:	Veröffentlicht
Begutachtet:	Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstanden:	Ja
Dokumenten-ID:	54089

Vorschau

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

ASCII CitationAtomBibTeXData Cite XMLDataCite XML OAIDublin CoreDublin Core (LZV)EndNoteHTML CitationJSONJSON LDMETSMODSOPENAIREOpenAPCRDF+N-TriplesRDF+N3RDF+XMLReferReference ManagerSimple MetadataXMLopenCostxMetaDissPlus

---

Zusammenfassung

Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further ...

Zusammenfassung

Background: Antibiotic-loaded bone cement in arthroplasties is currently experiencing increased usage. Therefore, single and double antibiotic-loaded bone cements are commercially available and used in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this investigation was to compare the clinical use of single compared to dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement for implant fixation after femoral neck fracture. Further infection rates were to be compared in (partial) arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture for both treatment options. Methods: On the basis of the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD), all cases of femoral neck fracture treated with hemiarthroplasty (HA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) with single and dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement, were included into the data analysis. The infection risk was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: In total, 26,845 cases (HA 76.3%—THA: 23.7%) with femoral neck fracture were included. Within recent years, an increasing usage of dual antibiotic-loaded cement in Germany, with a current proportion of 7.30% in arthroplasty procedures for femoral neck fracture treatment, has been observed. In patients treated with HA, the proportion of dual antibiotic-loaded cement was 7.86%, while in those treated with THA, 5.46% of all prostheses were fixated with a two antibiotic component cement. For all arthroplasty procedures using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after six months 1.8%, after one year 1.9%, and after five years 2.3%, of the cases failed due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while in the same time period, in cases with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement 1.5%, 1.5% and 1.5% suffered from infection (p = 0.34). A infection rate of 1.1% after HA with dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement was reported, compared to a 2.1% infection rate whilst using single antibiotic-loaded bone cement after five years (p = 0.098). The number required for treatment when using HA was 91. Conclusions: The use of dual antibiotic-loaded bone cement is increasingly used in arthroplasty procedures after femoral neck fractures. It demonstrates a reduction of PJI after HA and seems, therefore, to be a useful method for the prevention of infection, especially in patients with increased risk factors for PJI.

---

---

Metadaten zuletzt geändert: 10 Jul 2023 13:23

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

Downloadstatistik

Downloadstatistik

Downloadstatistik

Downloadstatistik

Downloads

Downloads im Monat während des letzten Jahres

Altmetric

Altmetric

Altmetric

Alternative Statistik (altmetrics)

Weitere Literatur (mittels CORE)

Weitere Literatur (mittels CORE)

Weitere Literatur (mittels CORE)

Weitere Literatur (mittels CORE)