| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 462kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
High task demand in dual-target paradigm redirects experimentally increased anxiety to uphold goal-directed attention
Stanković, Milos, Allenmark, Fredrik und Shi, Zhuanghua (2024) High task demand in dual-target paradigm redirects experimentally increased anxiety to uphold goal-directed attention. Perception 53 (4), S. 263-275.Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 24 Sep 2024 15:50
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.59267
Zusammenfassung
Previous research has shown that state anxiety facilitates stimulus-driven attentional capture and impairs goal-directed attentional control by increasing sensitivity to salient distractors or threat cues or narrowing spatial attention. However, recent findings in this area have been mixed, and less is known about how state-dependent anxiety may affect attentional performance. Here, we employed a ...
Previous research has shown that state anxiety facilitates stimulus-driven attentional capture and impairs goal-directed attentional control by increasing sensitivity to salient distractors or threat cues or narrowing spatial attention. However, recent findings in this area have been mixed, and less is known about how state-dependent anxiety may affect attentional performance. Here, we employed a novel dual-target search paradigm to investigate this relationship. This paradigm allowed us to investigate attentional control and how focus narrows under different anxiety states. Participants watched a short movie—either anxiety-inducing or neutral—before engaging in the dual-target visual search task. We found that they performed faster and more accurately in trials without the salient distractor compared to those with distractors, and they performed better in tasks presented on the center than the periphery. However, despite a significant increase in self-reported anxiety in the anxiety-inducing session, participants’ performance in terms of speed and accuracy remain comparable across both anxious and neutral sessions. This resilience is likely due to compensatory mechanisms that offset anxiety, a result of the high demands and working memory load inherent in the dual-target task.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Perception | ||||
| Verlag: | Sage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band: | 53 | ||||
| Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 4 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | S. 263-275 | ||||
| Datum | 4 März 2024 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | anxiety, attentional control, goal-directed attention, distractor, visual search | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-592677 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 59267 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik