Dokumentenart: | Artikel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift: | Dental Materials | ||||
Verlag: | ELSEVIER SCI LTD | ||||
Ort der Veröffentlichung: | OXFORD | ||||
Band: | 31 | ||||
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels: | 6 | ||||
Seitenbereich: | S. 745-757 | ||||
Datum: | 2015 | ||||
Institutionen: | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie > Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Helmut Schweikl | ||||
Identifikationsnummer: |
| ||||
Stichwörter / Keywords: | AESTHETIC RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; IN-VITRO; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; RESIN COMPOSITE; AGENTS; CYTOTOXICITY; MONOMERS; SURFACE; MICROHARDNESS; Bleaching; Peroxide; Dental composite; Elution; Comonomer; Polymer network | ||||
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation: | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
Status: | Veröffentlicht | ||||
Begutachtet: | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
An der Universität Regensburg entstanden: | Ja | ||||
Dokumenten-ID: | 60407 |
Zusammenfassung
Objectives. Bleaching treatments can affect on the polymer network of dental composites. This study was performed to evaluate the influence of different bleaching treatments on the elution of composite components. Methods. The composites Tetric EvoCeram (R), CLEARFIL (TM) AP-X, Tetric EvoFlow (R), Filtek (TM) Supreme XT, Ceram X (R) mono+, Admira and Filtek (TM) Silorane were treated with the ...
Zusammenfassung
Objectives. Bleaching treatments can affect on the polymer network of dental composites. This study was performed to evaluate the influence of different bleaching treatments on the elution of composite components. Methods. The composites Tetric EvoCeram (R), CLEARFIL (TM) AP-X, Tetric EvoFlow (R), Filtek (TM) Supreme XT, Ceram X (R) mono+, Admira and Filtek (TM) Silorane were treated with the bleaching gels Opalescence PF 15% (PF 15%) for 5 h and PF 35% (PF 35%) for 30 min and then stored in methanol and water for 24h and 7 d. The eluates were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Unbleached specimens were used as control group. Results. A total of 16 different elutable substances have been identified from the investigated composites after bleaching-treatment. Six of them were methacrylates: 1,10-decandioldimethacrylate (DDDMA), 1,12-dodekandioldimethacrylate (DODDMA), ethylenglycoldimethacrylate (EGDMA), 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), triethylenglycoldimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and urethandimethacrylate (UDMA). Compared with the unbleached controls the composites Tetric EvoCeram (R), CLEARFIL (TM) AP-X and Tetric EvoFlow (R) showed a reduced elution of UDMA, TEGDMA and HEMA after bleaching-treatment. Compared with the unbleached controls an increase elution of UDMA, DMABEE, BPA and TEGDMA for the composites Filtek (TM) Supreme XT, Ceram X (R) mono+, Admira and Filtek (TM) Silorane after bleaching-treatment has been detected. The highest concentration of UDMA was 0.01 mmol/1 (Tetric EvoCeram (R), water, 24 h, controls), the highest concentration of TEGDMA was 0.28 mmol/1 (CLEARFIL (TM) AP-X, water, 7 d, controls), the highest concentration of HEMA was 0.74 mmol/1(Tetric EvoFlow (R), methanol, 7 d, PF 35%), the highest concentration of DMABEE was 0.10 mmol/1 (Ceram X (R) mono+, water, 7 d, PF 35%) and the highest concentration of BPA was 0.01 mmol/1 (Admira, methanol, 7 d, controls). Signcance. Bleaching treatments can lead to a reduced or an increased elution of substances from the dental composites. 2015 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Metadaten zuletzt geändert: 19 Dez 2024 07:34