Zusammenfassung
The purpose of this study was to validate the diagnostic value of direct magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) arthrography and indirect MRI (iMRI) arthrography concerning intrinsic ligament injuries and tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). A randomized prospective trial was conducted with patients who presented with wrist pain potentially due to carpal lesions and 10 patients aged ...
Zusammenfassung
The purpose of this study was to validate the diagnostic value of direct magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) arthrography and indirect MRI (iMRI) arthrography concerning intrinsic ligament injuries and tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). A randomized prospective trial was conducted with patients who presented with wrist pain potentially due to carpal lesions and 10 patients aged 19-60 years (3 female and 7 male) were included. Between the clinical examination and the diagnostic and therapeutic arthroscopy, dMRI and iMRI arthrography were performed for the diagnostics of injuries of the intrinsic ligaments or the TFCC. The results of dMRI and iMRI arthrography were evaluated by two radiologists blinded to the injuries of the patients and a consensus was reached. The results were compared with the findings obtained by arthroscopy. In the arthroscopy five lesions of the scapholunate ligament (SL), one of the lunotriquetral ligament (LT) and seven of the TFCC were identified. The sensitivity of iMRI and dMRI for carpal ligament lesions (SL and LT) was low (50 %) whereas the specificity was high (93 %). For injuries of the TFCC the sensitivity (up to 100 %) and the specificity (100 %) were both excellent. The area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was high for TFCC lesions in both dMRI and iMRI arthrography. Indirect MRI arthrography is a suitable method for detection of injuries of the TFCC and intrinsic ligaments of the wrist with good sensitivity and specificity. Despite the low number of patients the results of this study showed that there were no essential differences between dMRI and iMRI arthrography with respect to the diagnostic value for carpal injuries of the wrist.