Direkt zum Inhalt

Owner only: item control page
Bindellini, Davide ; Simon, Philipp ; Busse, David ; Michelet, Robin ; Petroff, David ; Aulin, Linda B. S. ; Dorn, Christoph ; Zeitlinger, Markus ; Huisinga, Wilhelm ; Wrigge, Hermann ; Kloft, Charlotte

Evaluation of the need for dosing adaptations in obese patients for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a model-based analysis of cefazolin pharmacokinetics

Bindellini, Davide, Simon, Philipp, Busse, David, Michelet, Robin, Petroff, David, Aulin, Linda B. S., Dorn, Christoph , Zeitlinger, Markus, Huisinga, Wilhelm, Wrigge, Hermann and Kloft, Charlotte (2025) Evaluation of the need for dosing adaptations in obese patients for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a model-based analysis of cefazolin pharmacokinetics. British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 04 Feb 2025 07:06
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.74824


Abstract

Background: Cefazolin is used as a prophylactic antibiotic to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). Obesity has been identified as a risk factor for SSIs. Cefazolin dosing recommendations and guidelines are currently inconsistent for obese patients. As plasma and target-site exposure might differ, pharmacokinetic data from the sites of SSIs are essential to evaluate treatment efficacy: these ...

Background: Cefazolin is used as a prophylactic antibiotic to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). Obesity has been identified as a risk factor for SSIs. Cefazolin dosing recommendations and guidelines are currently inconsistent for obese patients. As plasma and target-site exposure might differ, pharmacokinetic data from the sites of SSIs are essential to evaluate treatment efficacy: these data can be obtained via tissue microdialysis. This analysis was designed to evaluate the need for dosing adaptations in obese patients for surgical prophylaxis.

Methods: Data from 15 obese (BMImedian = 52.6 kg m-2) and 15 age- and sex-matched nonobese patients (BMImedian = 26.0 kg m-2) who received 2 g cefazolin i.v. infusion for infection prophylaxis were included in the analysis. Pharmacokinetic data from plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of adipose tissue were obtained and analysed simultaneously using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. Dosing regimens were evaluated by calculating the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for plasma and ISF using unbound cefazolin concentration above minimum inhibitory concentration 100% of the time as target (fT>MIC = 100%). Dosing regimens were considered adequate when PTA and CFR were ≥90%.

Results: Evaluation of cefazolin doses of 1 and 2 g with redosing at either 3 or 4 h by PTA and CFR in plasma and ISF found 2 g cefazolin with redosing at 4 h to be the most suitable dosing regimen for both obese and nonobese patients (PTA >90% and CFR >90% for both).

Conclusions: This model-based analysis, using fT>MIC = 100% as a target, showed that cefazolin dosing adaptations are not required for surgical prophylaxis in obese patients.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher:Elsevier
Open Access Type:CC-License
Date1 February 2025
InstitutionsChemistry and Pharmacy > Institute of Pharmacy > Group Clinical Pharmacy (Dr. Dorn)
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.044DOI
Keywordscefazolin; microdialysis; obesity; pharmacokinetics; population analysis; surgical antibiotic prophylaxis
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 615 Pharmacy
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgPartially
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-748241
Item ID74824

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben