| Dokumentenart: | Artikel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift: | European Urology Open Science | ||||
| Verlag: | ELSEVIER | ||||
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | AMSTERDAM | ||||
| Band: | 52 | ||||
| Seitenbereich: | S. 154-165 | ||||
| Datum: | 2023 | ||||
| Institutionen: | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Urologie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer: |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords: | INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; SYSTEMS; TUMORS; Bladder; Cancer; Grading; Survey; European Association of Urology; International Society of; Urological Pathology; WHO1973; WHO2004 | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation: | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status: | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet: | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden: | Ja | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID: | 76295 |
Web of ScienceZusammenfassung
Background: Grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is an impor-tant prognostic factor for progression. Currently, two World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems (WHO1973, categories: grade 1-3, and WHO2004 categories: papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential [PUNLMP], low-grade [LG], high-grade [HG] carcinoma) are used.Objective: To ask the European ...
Zusammenfassung
Background: Grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is an impor-tant prognostic factor for progression. Currently, two World Health Organization (WHO) classification systems (WHO1973, categories: grade 1-3, and WHO2004 categories: papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential [PUNLMP], low-grade [LG], high-grade [HG] carcinoma) are used.Objective: To ask the European Association of Urology (EAU) and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) members regarding their current practice and preferences of grading systems. Design, setting, and participants: A web-based, anonymous questionnaire with ten questions on grading of NMIBC was created. The members of EAU and ISUP were invited to complete an online survey by the end of 2021. Thirteen experts had pre-viously answered the same questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The submitted answers from 214 ISUP members, 191 EAU members, and 13 experts were analyzed.Results and limitations: Currently, 53% use only the WHO2004 system and 40% use both systems. According to most respondents, PUNLMP is a rare diagnosis with management similar to Ta-LG carcinoma. The majority (72%) would consider reverting back to WHO1973 if grading criteria were more detailed. Separate report-ing of WHO1973-G3 within WHO2004-HG would influence clinical decisions for Ta and/or T1 tumors according the majority (55%). Most respondents preferred a two-tier (41%) or a three-tier (41%) grading system. The current WHO2004 grading sys-tem is supported by a minority (20%), whereas nearly half (48%) supported a hybrid three-or four-tier grading system composed of both WHO1973 and WHO2004. The survey results of the experts were comparable with ISUP and EAU respondents.Conclusions: Both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 grading system are still widely used. Even though opinions on the future of bladder cancer grading were strongly divided, there was limited support for WHO1973 and WHO2004 in their current formats, while the hybrid (three-tier) grading system with LG, HG-G2, and HG -G3 as categories could be considered the most promising alternative. Patient summary: Grading of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a matter of ongoing debate and lacks international consensus. We surveyed urolo-gists and pathologists of European Association of Urology and International Society of Urological Pathology on their preferences regarding NMIBC grading to generate a multidisciplinary dialogue. Both the "old"World Health Organization (WHO) 1973 and the "new"WHO2004 grading schemes are still used widely. However, continuation of both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 system showed limited support, while a hybrid grading system composed of both the WHO1973 and the WHO2004 classification system may be considered a promising alternative.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Metadaten zuletzt geändert: 18 Mrz 2025 10:11
Altmetric