Direkt zum Inhalt

Chrobot, Nikolas ; Alfertshofer, Michael ; Frank, Konstantin ; Smolka, Wenko ; Anker, Alexandra ; Taxis, Juergen ; Ettl, Tobias ; Prantl, Lukas ; Brébant, Vanessa ; Hartmann, Robin

Advancing digital anthropometry in plastic surgery: Comparing smartphone 3D surface imaging to Vectra H2 in breast reconstruction

Chrobot, Nikolas , Alfertshofer, Michael, Frank, Konstantin , Smolka, Wenko, Anker, Alexandra , Taxis, Juergen , Ettl, Tobias , Prantl, Lukas , Brébant, Vanessa and Hartmann, Robin (2025) Advancing digital anthropometry in plastic surgery: Comparing smartphone 3D surface imaging to Vectra H2 in breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 104, pp. 398-406.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 29 Apr 2025 04:12
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.76611


Abstract

Background Digital anthropometry is a useful tool for surgeons and patients in breast reconstruction surgery (BRS). Owing to advancements in smartphone technology, these devices can be used for three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging. In this prospective study, anthropometric measurements of the breast were performed using a smartphone and compared with measurements obtained using an established ...

Background
Digital anthropometry is a useful tool for surgeons and patients in breast reconstruction surgery (BRS). Owing to advancements in smartphone technology, these devices can be used for three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging. In this prospective study, anthropometric measurements of the breast were performed using a smartphone and compared with measurements obtained using an established 3D surface imaging system.
Methods
In this study, 40 patients who underwent BRS were included. 3D-surface models (SMs) were obtained using the Vectra H2 stereophotogrammetry camera (Canfield Scientific, USA) and an iPhone 15 (Apple Inc., USA) in combination with the 3D Scanner App (Laan Consulting Corp., USA). Fourteen measurements were performed on all 3D SMs. Subsequently, smartphone-based measurements were compared to Vectra-based measurements. Statistical methods used were the paired t-test, paired Wilcoxon-signed ranks test, Bland–Altman analyses, and calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
All measurements demonstrated excellent agreement between those obtained using the smartphone and Vectra H2 (ICC between.963 and.998). No statistical differences were found for 11 of the 14 anthropometric measurements. The Bland–Altman analyses yielded promising results, demonstrating 95% limits of agreement within a range of less than ±2 mm between the 2 methods.
Conclusion
The proposed method for smartphone-based anthropometry of the breast showed moderate accuracy for clinical use. However, the approach used to create and evaluate the 3D SMs is considered laborious. Therefore, further refinement of the method may be necessary to enable the implementation of smartphone-based surface imaging in plastic surgery.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Publisher:Elsevier
Volume:104
Page Range:pp. 398-406
Date22 March 2025
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie
Medicine > Zentren des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg > Zentrum für Plastische-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.039DOI
KeywordsThree-dimensional surface imaging; Stereophotogrammetry; Smartphone-based surface imaging; Digital anthropometry; Vectra H2; Breast
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgPartially
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-766118
Item ID76611

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben