| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 728kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
Theta burst stimulation with 80 and 120% resting motor threshold do not differ in their antidepressant efficacy: a retrospective analysis
Artikel
Abdelnaim, Mohamed A.
, Reissmann, Andreas
, Kerkel, Katharina, Aamer, Mohamed, Huebner, Johannes, Poeppl, Timm B.
, Schoisswohl, Stefan
und Langguth, Berthold
(2026)
Theta burst stimulation with 80 and 120% resting motor threshold do not differ in their antidepressant efficacy: a retrospective analysis.
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.80820
Zusammenfassung
Background rTMS, particularly intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), is an effective treatment for treatment-resistant depression; however, the optimal stimulation intensity remains uncertain. Clinical protocols typically use intensities between 80 and 120% of resting motor threshold (RMT), but direct comparative evidence is limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 215 ...
Background
rTMS, particularly intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), is an effective treatment for treatment-resistant depression; however, the optimal stimulation intensity remains uncertain. Clinical protocols typically use intensities between 80 and 120% of resting motor threshold (RMT), but direct comparative evidence is limited.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 215 patients with unipolar or bipolar depression who received iTBS at either 120% RMT (n = 108) or 80% RMT (n = 107). Depression severity was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21) and Major Depression Inventory (MDI) before and after treatment. Response (≥ 50% symptom reduction) and remission (HAMD-21 ≤ 7; MDI ≤ 14) rates were compared between groups using mixed ANOVAs, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (p < .025). In addition, non-inferiority analyses were performed.
Results
Both groups showed large, significant symptom reductions (HAMD-21: F(1,213) = 250.98, p < .001, partial η² = 0.541; MDI: F(1,213) = 247.45, p < .001, partial η² = 0.537). No significant group effects or group × time interactions emerged for either scale. In a formal non-inferiority analysis (ANCOVA adjusting for baseline severity), 80% RMT was non-inferior to 120% RMT on the HAMD-21 (adjusted difference − 0.90, 95% CI [− 2.61, 0.82]; margin 2.25 points), a result robust across sensitivity analyses. Response rates ranged from 30.84 to 38.32% and remission rates from 23.36 to 31.48%, with no significant differences between intensity groups. Side effects occurred in 20.56% (80% RMT) versus 27.77% (120% RMT) of patients. Notably, treatment-site pain necessitating intensity reduction occurred exclusively in the 120% RMT group (n = 5, 4.6%).
Conclusion
iTBS at 80% RMT produced antidepressant outcomes non-inferior to iTBS at 120% RMT on the HAMD-21, with supportive MDI findings and better tolerability. These findings suggest a broader intensity range for antidepressant effects of iTBS and support the systematic investigation of lower-intensity protocols.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | ||||
| Verlag | Springer | ||||
| Open Access Art | DEAL (Springer) | ||||
| Datum | 26 September 2026 | ||||
| Veröffentlichungsdatum | 29 Sep 2026 05:35 | ||||
| Institutionen | Medizin > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | Major depressive disorder (MDD) · Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) · Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) · Resting motor threshold (RMT) · Intensity | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Zum Teil | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-808205 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 80820 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik