| License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Image (TIFF) Figure S1 (1MB) | |
| License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Image (TIFF) Figure S2 (1MB) | |
| License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Image (TIFF) Figure S3 (797kB) | |
| License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Image (TIFF) Figure S4 (2MB) | |
| License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Image (TIFF) Figure S5 (816kB) | |
![[img]](https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/style/images/fileicons/video_x-msvideo.png) | License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Video (AVI) Video S1 (1MB) |
- URN to cite this document:
- urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-316047
- DOI to cite this document:
- 10.5283/epub.31604
-
Maye, A., Hsieh, C., Sugihara, G. and Brembs, Björn (2007) Order in spontaneous behavior. PLoS ONE 2 (5), e443.Preview
-
PreviewPreviewPreviewPreviewPreview
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn
(2007)
Order in Spontaneous Behavior.
[Image]
[Currently displayed]
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Alternative models conceptualizing the open-loop experiment. [Image]Preview
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Flight simulator set-up. [Image]Preview
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Spontaneous behavior is not simply random. [Image]Preview
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Correlation dimension. [Image]Preview
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Long-range correlations in fly ISIs. [Image]Preview
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Nonlinearity implies instability. [Image]Preview
-
Maye, Alexander, Hsieh, Chih-hao, Sugihara, George and Brembs, Björn (2007) Suggested models for open-and closed-loop experiments. [Image]Preview
-
![[img]](https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/style/images/fileicons/application_zip.png)
Brembs, Björn
(2014)
Order in spontaneous behavior.
[Dataset]
-
| Item type: | Image | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date: | 16 May 2007 | ||||||||||||||
| Institutions: | Biology, Preclinical Medicine > Institut für Zoologie > Neurogenetik (Prof. Dr. Björn Brembs) | ||||||||||||||
| Identification Number: |
| ||||||||||||||
| Keywords: | spontaneous | ||||||||||||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 500 Science > 590 Zoological sciences 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine | ||||||||||||||
| Status: | Published | ||||||||||||||
| Refereed: | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||||||||||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg: | No | ||||||||||||||
| Item ID: | 31604 |
Abstract
Brains are usually described as input/output systems: they transform sensory input into motor output. However, the motor output of brains (behavior) is notoriously variable, even under identical sensory conditions. The question of whether this behavioral variability merely reflects residual deviations due to extrinsic random noise in such otherwise deterministic systems or an intrinsic, adaptive ...
Abstract
Brains are usually described as input/output systems: they transform sensory input into motor output. However, the motor output of brains (behavior) is notoriously variable, even under identical sensory conditions. The question of whether this behavioral variability merely reflects residual deviations due to extrinsic random noise in such otherwise deterministic systems or an intrinsic, adaptive indeterminacy trait is central for the basic understanding of brain function. Instead of random noise, we find a fractal order (resembling Lévy flights) in the temporal structure of spontaneous flight maneuvers in tethered Drosophila fruit flies. Lévy-like probabilistic behavior patterns are evolutionarily conserved, suggesting a general neural mechanism underlying spontaneous behavior. Drosophila can produce these patterns endogenously, without any external cues. The fly's behavior is controlled by brain circuits which operate as a nonlinear system with unstable dynamics far from equilibrium. These findings suggest that both general models of brain function and autonomous agents ought to include biologically relevant nonlinear, endogenous behavior-initiating mechanisms if they strive to realistically simulate biological brains or out-compete other agents.
Figure S1:
Example yaw torque traces. Left column-total traces. Right column-magnified section from minutes 5-10 of the total traces. Red lines delineate enlarged sections. Upper row is from an animal flying in open loop in a featureless, white panorama (openloop). The middle row is from an animal flying in closed loop in a panorama with a single black stripe (onestripe). The lower row is from an animal flying in closed loop in a uniformly dashed arena (uniform).
Figure S2:
Descriptive statistics of spiking behavior. A-The probability to perform consecutive spikes in the same direction. Random spike directions show equal probability for left and right turns, while fly data are dependent on the environmental situation of the fly. Flies fixate a single stripe and hence produce alternating spikes to keep the stripe in front of them. The onestripe group therefore is more similar to the poisson group than the other fly groups. Flies in uniform environments show persistent turning direction over several consecutive spikes. These spike trains in the same direction can be interpreted as search spirals. B-Total number of spikes.
Figure S3:
Log-linear plots of fly and Poisson data. Corroborating the results from our GRIP analysis, exponential distributions (straight black lines) cannot be fitted to fly ISI series, whereas the poisson series shows the expected exponential distribution. Fly ISI series all show an excess of long intervals, suggesting a heavy-tailed distribution. See Methods for details.
Figure S4:
Schematic diagrams of complex stochastic and simple nonlinear models. A-The branching Poisson process (BPP) as an example for complex stochastic models. The BPP consists of cascading units of filter functions and Poisson processes. Each unit's filter function receives the events from the Poisson process upstream and drives the rate of the Poisson process associated with it. The (unfiltered) output of all Poisson processes is combined to yield the total output of the model. B-The nonlinear automat is an example how simple nonlinear processes can generate complex behavior. The activator sends excitatory input to both turn generators.
Figure S5:
S-Map analysis of all fly data and additional control series. A-S-Map analysis of ISI series. Depicted are the averaged results for the three fly groups. Interestingly, the fly group with a singularity in the environment (onestripe) can be clearly distinguished from the two groups with uniform environment (openloop and uniform). Note that the closed-loop groups (onestripe and uniform) also exhibit the nonlinear signature, excluding the possibility that the variability is an artefact of the constant stimulus situation in the openloop group. B-S-Map analysis of raw data series. At high parameter values, the logistic map shows the typical increase in forecast skill with increasingly nonlinear models, while the noisy sine function does not show any such improvement. The nonlinear agent (automat) with the originally published parameters behaves almost randomly, despite the nonlinear mechanisms generating the output. The fly data come to lie in-between the extreme control data, showing both an increase in forecast skill with increasingly nonlinear models and moderate overall correlation coefficients.
Video S1:
Tethered Drosophila. Tethered flying Drosophila can beat its wings, move its abdomen, legs and proboscis, but cannot rotate or otherwise move.
Metadata last modified: 29 Sep 2021 07:40
Owner only: item control page
Download Statistics