Direkt zum Inhalt

Berenbaum, F. ; Grifka, Joachim ; Cazzaniga, S. ; D'Amato, M. ; Giacovelli, G. ; Chevalier, X. ; Rannou, F. ; Rovati, L. C. ; Maheu, E.

A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

Berenbaum, F., Grifka, Joachim, Cazzaniga, S., D'Amato, M., Giacovelli, G., Chevalier, X., Rannou, F., Rovati, L. C. and Maheu, E. (2019) A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial comparing two intra-articular hyaluronic acid preparations differing by their molecular weight in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 71, pp. 1454-1460.

Date of publication of this fulltext: 05 Sep 2017 13:13
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.36151


Abstract

Objectives To compare the effects of an intermediate molecular weight (MW) intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) with a low MW product on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms. Methods Patients with symptomatic knee OA were enrolled inarandomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial with the possibility to shift to superiority. Patients were randomised to GO-ON(MW 800-1500 ...

Objectives To compare the effects of an intermediate molecular weight (MW) intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) with a low MW product on knee osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms. Methods Patients with symptomatic knee OA were enrolled inarandomised, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial with the possibility to shift to superiority. Patients were randomised to GO-ON(MW 800-1500 kD,25 mg/2.5 ml) or Hyalgan(MW 500-730 kD, 20 mg/2 ml) injected at 3-weekly intervals. The primary outcome was 6-month change in the WOMAC pain subscale (0-100 mm). Sample size was calculated on a non-inferiority margin of 9 mm, lower than the minimum perceptible clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included OARSI-OMERACT responder rates Results The intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations consisted of 217 and 209 patients and 171 and 172 patients in the GO-ON and Hyalgan groups, respectively. ITT WOMAC pain of 47.5 +/- 1.0(SE) and 48.8 +/- 1.0 mm decreased by 22.9 +/- 1.4 mm with GO-ON and 18.4 +/- 1.5 mm with Hyalgan after 6 months. The primary analysis was conducted in the PP population followed by the ITT population. Mean (95% CI) differences in WOMAC pain change were 5.2 (0.9 to 9.6) mm and 4.5 (0.5 to 8.5) mm, respectively, favouring GO-ON, satisfying the claim for non-inferiority (lower limit> -9 mm) and for statistical superiority (95% CI all>0, p=0.021). Ahigher proportion of OARSI/OMERACT responders was observed with GO-ONthan with Hyalgan (73.3% vs58.4%, p=0.001). Both preparations were well tolerated. Conclusions Treatment with 3-weekly injections of intermediate MW HA may be superior to low MW HA on knee OA symptoms over 6 months, with similar safety.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitleAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher:BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Place of Publication:LONDON
Volume:71
Page Range:pp. 1454-1460
Date2019
InstitutionsMedicine > Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200972DOI
KeywordsPATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; INJECTIONS; CRITERIA; HYLAN;
Dewey Decimal Classification600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgPartially
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-361514
Item ID36151

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben