Direkt zum Inhalt

Krueger, Konstanze ; Schneider, Gudrun ; Flauger, Birgit ; Heinze, Jürgen

Context-dependent third-party intervention in agonistic encounters of male Przewalski horses
Short title: Third-party intervention in Przewalski horses

Krueger, Konstanze , Schneider, Gudrun, Flauger, Birgit und Heinze, Jürgen (2015) Context-dependent third-party intervention in agonistic encounters of male Przewalski horses
Short title: Third-party intervention in Przewalski horses.
Behavioural Processes 121, S. 54-62.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 27 Feb 2018 07:43
Artikel


Zusammenfassung

One mechanism to resolve conflict among group members is third party intervention, for which several functions, such as kin protection, alliance formation, and the promotion of group cohesion have been proposed. Still, empirical research on the function of intervention behaviour is rare. We studied 40 cases of intervention behaviour in a field study on 13 semi-wild bachelor horses (Equus ferus ...

One mechanism to resolve conflict among group members is third party intervention, for which several functions, such as kin protection, alliance formation, and the promotion of group cohesion have been proposed. Still, empirical research on the function of intervention behaviour is rare. We studied 40 cases of intervention behaviour in a field study on 13 semi-wild bachelor horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) in (a) standard social situations, and (b) when new horses joined the group (i.e. introductions). Only interventions in agonistic encounters were analysed. Eight of 13 animals directed intervention behaviour toward threatening animal in agonistic encounters of group members. One stallion was particularly active. The stallions did not intervene to support former group mates or kin and interventions were not reciprocated. In introduction situations and in standard social situations, the interveners supported animals which were lower in rank, but targeted, threatening animals of comparable social rank. After introductions, stallions received more affiliative behaviour from animals they supported and thus appeared to intervene for alliance formation. In standard social situations, interveners did not receive more affiliative behaviour from animals they supported and may primarily have intervened to promote group cohesion and to reduce social disruption within the group. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftBehavioural Processes
Verlag:ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
Ort der Veröffentlichung:AMSTERDAM
Band:121
Seitenbereich:S. 54-62
DatumDezember 2015
InstitutionenBiologie und Vorklinische Medizin > Institut für Zoologie
Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin > Institut für Zoologie > Zoologie/Evolutionsbiologie (Prof. Dr. Jürgen Heinze)
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.009DOI
Stichwörter / KeywordsREPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; BIOLOGICAL MARKETS; ANIMAL SOCIETIES; EQUUS-CABALLUS; PARTNER CHOICE; SOCIAL BONDS; FERAL HORSES; EXPLANATION; COOPERATION; RECIPROCITY; Equus ferus przewalskii; Group conflict; Rank orders; Social bonds; Social control; Third-party intervention
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-368086
Dokumenten-ID36808

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben