Direkt zum Inhalt

Baumann, Oliver ; Greenlee, Mark W.

Effects of Attention to Auditory Motion on Cortical Activations during Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking

Article

Baumann, Oliver and Greenlee, Mark W. (2009) Effects of Attention to Auditory Motion on Cortical Activations during Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking. PLoS ONE 4 (9), e7110.

DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.41217


Abstract

Background In contrast to traditional views that consider smooth pursuit as a relatively automatic process, evidence has been reported for the importance of attention for accurate pursuit performance. However, the exact role that attention might play in the maintenance of pursuit remains unclear. Methodology/Principal Findings We analysed the neuronal activity associated with healthy subjects ...

Background
In contrast to traditional views that consider smooth pursuit as a relatively automatic process, evidence has been reported for the importance of attention for accurate pursuit performance. However, the exact role that attention might play in the maintenance of pursuit remains unclear.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We analysed the neuronal activity associated with healthy subjects executing smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) during concurrent attentive tracking of a moving sound source, which was either in-phase or in antiphase to the executed eye movements. Assuming that attentional resources must be allocated to the moving sound source, the simultaneous execution of SPEM and auditory tracking in diverging directions should result in increased load on common attentional resources. By using an auditory stimulus as a distractor rather then a visual stimulus we guaranteed that cortical activity cannot be caused by conflicts between two simultaneous visual motion stimuli. Our results revealed that the smooth pursuit task with divided attention led to significantly higher activations bilaterally in the posterior parietal cortex and lateral and medial frontal cortex, presumably containing the parietal, frontal and supplementary eye fields respectively.
Conclusions
The additional cortical activation in these areas is apparently due to the process of dividing attention between the execution of SPEM and the covert tracking of the auditory target. On the other hand, even though attention had to be divided the attentional resources did not seem to be exhausted, since the identification of the direction of the auditory target and the quality of SPEM were unaffected by the congruence between visual and auditory motion stimuli. Finally, we found that this form of task-related attention modulated not only the cortical pursuit network in general but also affected modality specific and supramodal attention regions.



Involved Institutions


Details

Item typeArticle
Journal or Publication TitlePLoS ONE
PublisherPLOS
Open Access TypeDue to SHERPA/RoMEO
Volume4
Number of Issue or Book Chapter9
Page Rangee7110
Date2009
Date of publication10 Jan 2020 14:22
InstitutionsHuman Sciences > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie I (Allgemeine Psychologie I und Methodenlehre) - Prof. Dr. Mark W. Greenlee
Identification Number
ValueType
10.1371/journal.pone.0007110DOI
Dewey Decimal Classification100 Philosophy & psychology > 150 Psychology
500 Science > 570 Life sciences
StatusPublished
RefereedYes, this version has been refereed
Created at the University of RegensburgYes
URN of the UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-412171
Item ID41217

Export bibliographical data

Owner only: item control page

nach oben