| Download ( PDF | 260kB) | License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
Effects of Attention to Auditory Motion on Cortical Activations during Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking
Article
Baumann, Oliver
and Greenlee, Mark W.
(2009)
Effects of Attention to Auditory Motion on Cortical Activations during Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking.
PLoS ONE 4 (9), e7110.
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.41217
Abstract
Background In contrast to traditional views that consider smooth pursuit as a relatively automatic process, evidence has been reported for the importance of attention for accurate pursuit performance. However, the exact role that attention might play in the maintenance of pursuit remains unclear. Methodology/Principal Findings We analysed the neuronal activity associated with healthy subjects ...
Background
In contrast to traditional views that consider smooth pursuit as a relatively automatic process, evidence has been reported for the importance of attention for accurate pursuit performance. However, the exact role that attention might play in the maintenance of pursuit remains unclear.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We analysed the neuronal activity associated with healthy subjects executing smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) during concurrent attentive tracking of a moving sound source, which was either in-phase or in antiphase to the executed eye movements. Assuming that attentional resources must be allocated to the moving sound source, the simultaneous execution of SPEM and auditory tracking in diverging directions should result in increased load on common attentional resources. By using an auditory stimulus as a distractor rather then a visual stimulus we guaranteed that cortical activity cannot be caused by conflicts between two simultaneous visual motion stimuli. Our results revealed that the smooth pursuit task with divided attention led to significantly higher activations bilaterally in the posterior parietal cortex and lateral and medial frontal cortex, presumably containing the parietal, frontal and supplementary eye fields respectively.
Conclusions
The additional cortical activation in these areas is apparently due to the process of dividing attention between the execution of SPEM and the covert tracking of the auditory target. On the other hand, even though attention had to be divided the attentional resources did not seem to be exhausted, since the identification of the direction of the auditory target and the quality of SPEM were unaffected by the congruence between visual and auditory motion stimuli. Finally, we found that this form of task-related attention modulated not only the cortical pursuit network in general but also affected modality specific and supramodal attention regions.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | PLoS ONE | ||||
| Publisher | PLOS | ||||
| Open Access Type | Due to SHERPA/RoMEO | ||||
| Volume | 4 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter | 9 | ||||
| Page Range | e7110 | ||||
| Date | 2009 | ||||
| Date of publication | 10 Jan 2020 14:22 | ||||
| Institutions | Human Sciences > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie I (Allgemeine Psychologie I und Methodenlehre) - Prof. Dr. Mark W. Greenlee | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 100 Philosophy & psychology > 150 Psychology 500 Science > 570 Life sciences | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-412171 | ||||
| Item ID | 41217 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics