Direkt zum Inhalt

Baumann, Oliver ; Greenlee, Mark W.

Effects of Attention to Auditory Motion on Cortical Activations during Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking

Baumann, Oliver und Greenlee, Mark W. (2009) Effects of Attention to Auditory Motion on Cortical Activations during Smooth Pursuit Eye Tracking. PLoS ONE 4 (9), e7110.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 10 Jan 2020 14:22
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.41217


Zusammenfassung

Background In contrast to traditional views that consider smooth pursuit as a relatively automatic process, evidence has been reported for the importance of attention for accurate pursuit performance. However, the exact role that attention might play in the maintenance of pursuit remains unclear. Methodology/Principal Findings We analysed the neuronal activity associated with healthy subjects ...

Background
In contrast to traditional views that consider smooth pursuit as a relatively automatic process, evidence has been reported for the importance of attention for accurate pursuit performance. However, the exact role that attention might play in the maintenance of pursuit remains unclear.
Methodology/Principal Findings
We analysed the neuronal activity associated with healthy subjects executing smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) during concurrent attentive tracking of a moving sound source, which was either in-phase or in antiphase to the executed eye movements. Assuming that attentional resources must be allocated to the moving sound source, the simultaneous execution of SPEM and auditory tracking in diverging directions should result in increased load on common attentional resources. By using an auditory stimulus as a distractor rather then a visual stimulus we guaranteed that cortical activity cannot be caused by conflicts between two simultaneous visual motion stimuli. Our results revealed that the smooth pursuit task with divided attention led to significantly higher activations bilaterally in the posterior parietal cortex and lateral and medial frontal cortex, presumably containing the parietal, frontal and supplementary eye fields respectively.
Conclusions
The additional cortical activation in these areas is apparently due to the process of dividing attention between the execution of SPEM and the covert tracking of the auditory target. On the other hand, even though attention had to be divided the attentional resources did not seem to be exhausted, since the identification of the direction of the auditory target and the quality of SPEM were unaffected by the congruence between visual and auditory motion stimuli. Finally, we found that this form of task-related attention modulated not only the cortical pursuit network in general but also affected modality specific and supramodal attention regions.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftPLoS ONE
Verlag:PLOS
Band:4
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:9
Seitenbereich:e7110
Datum2009
InstitutionenHumanwissenschaften > Institut für Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Psychologie I (Allgemeine Psychologie I und Methodenlehre) - Prof. Dr. Mark W. Greenlee
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1371/journal.pone.0007110DOI
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenJa
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-412171
Dokumenten-ID41217

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben