Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison
von der Mühlen, Sarah, Richter, Tobias
, Schmid, Sebastian, Schmidt, Elisabeth Marie and Berthold, Kirsten
(2016)
Judging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison.
Thinking & Reasoning 22 (2), pp. 221-249.
Date of publication of this fulltext: 17 Mar 2020 11:27
Article
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Thinking & Reasoning | ||||
| Publisher: | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place of Publication: | ABINGDON | ||||
| Volume: | 22 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 2 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 221-249 | ||||
| Date | 2016 | ||||
| Institutions | Human Sciences > Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | MODELS; PERSUASIVENESS; STRATEGIES; epistemic competences; think-aloud procedure; Informal argument evaluation; mental model theory; competences in higher education | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 300 Social sciences > 370 Education | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| Item ID | 42303 |
Export bibliographical data
Owner only: item control page
Altmetric
Altmetric