| PDF (141kB) |
- URN zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:
- urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-opus-4760
- DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments:
- 10.5283/epub.4518
Es ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar. |
Zusammenfassung
Contrary to what is consistently assumed in the literature, the return function cannot be hump-shaped in the Stiglitz-Weiss (1981) model. This has important consequences for the possible occurrence of credit rationing and redlining. With a single class of borrowers, banks offer credit in two stages. Demand possibly exceeds supply in stage one, but not in stage two. With several observationally ...
Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags