| Published Version Download ( PDF | 892kB) | License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
The influence of the design of mental rotation trials on performance and possible differences between sexes: A theoretical review and experimental investigation
Jost, Leonardo
and Jansen, Petra
(2023)
The influence of the design of mental rotation trials on performance and possible differences between sexes: A theoretical review and experimental investigation.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Date of publication of this fulltext: 16 Nov 2023 15:43
Article
DOI to cite this document: 10.5283/epub.55016
Abstract
Sex differences in mental rotation performance are one of the largest in cognitive psychology. Men outperform women by up to 1 SD in psychometric mental rotation tests, but it is often neglected that there are no or only small sex differences for chronometric tests. As both tests are supposed to measure the same ability, we suspect some features of the tests themselves to affect sex differences ...
Sex differences in mental rotation performance are one of the largest in cognitive psychology. Men outperform women by up to 1 SD in psychometric mental rotation tests, but it is often neglected that there are no or only small sex differences for chronometric tests. As both tests are supposed to measure the same ability, we suspect some features of the tests themselves to affect sex differences in performance. Following a theoretical review of the test features, we evaluate the effects of the number of possible answer alternatives, whether they are presented as pairwise mirrored, and their interaction on sex differences in mental rotation performance. In an online experiment, 838 German-speaking participants, 421 women, 417 men, Mage = 42.58 (SD = 12.54) years, solved four blocks of mental rotation trials with two or eight alternatives, which were either pairwise mirrored or not. The results show that that the overall performance was lower for more alternatives and for mixed alternatives but not for their interaction. We could not determine explanations for sex differences as we did not observe meaningful sex differences at all. Possible reasons include the differences between men and women in age and education. This study suggests that the differences between tests affect performance. Sex differences, however, need more investigation, including possible effects and interactions of the test design, education, and age.
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | ||||
| Publisher: | SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place of Publication: | LONDON | ||||
| Date | 29 August 2023 | ||||
| Institutions | Human Sciences > Institut für Sportwissenschaft | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | GENDER-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; SPATIAL ABILITIES; WORKING-MEMORY; ITEM TYPES; FIGURES; WOMEN; SPEED; STEREOTYPES; MAGNITUDE; Mental rotation; sex differences; test design; multiple choice | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 100 Philosophy & psychology > 150 Psychology 700 Arts & recreation > 796 Athletic & outdoor sports & games | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| URN of the UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-550161 | ||||
| Item ID | 55016 |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics