| Veröffentlichte Version Download ( PDF | 892kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International |
The influence of the design of mental rotation trials on performance and possible differences between sexes: A theoretical review and experimental investigation
Jost, Leonardo
und Jansen, Petra
(2023)
The influence of the design of mental rotation trials on performance and possible differences between sexes: A theoretical review and experimental investigation.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 16 Nov 2023 15:43
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.55016
Zusammenfassung
Sex differences in mental rotation performance are one of the largest in cognitive psychology. Men outperform women by up to 1 SD in psychometric mental rotation tests, but it is often neglected that there are no or only small sex differences for chronometric tests. As both tests are supposed to measure the same ability, we suspect some features of the tests themselves to affect sex differences ...
Sex differences in mental rotation performance are one of the largest in cognitive psychology. Men outperform women by up to 1 SD in psychometric mental rotation tests, but it is often neglected that there are no or only small sex differences for chronometric tests. As both tests are supposed to measure the same ability, we suspect some features of the tests themselves to affect sex differences in performance. Following a theoretical review of the test features, we evaluate the effects of the number of possible answer alternatives, whether they are presented as pairwise mirrored, and their interaction on sex differences in mental rotation performance. In an online experiment, 838 German-speaking participants, 421 women, 417 men, Mage = 42.58 (SD = 12.54) years, solved four blocks of mental rotation trials with two or eight alternatives, which were either pairwise mirrored or not. The results show that that the overall performance was lower for more alternatives and for mixed alternatives but not for their interaction. We could not determine explanations for sex differences as we did not observe meaningful sex differences at all. Possible reasons include the differences between men and women in age and education. This study suggests that the differences between tests affect performance. Sex differences, however, need more investigation, including possible effects and interactions of the test design, education, and age.
Alternative Links zum Volltext
Beteiligte Einrichtungen
Details
| Dokumentenart | Artikel | ||||
| Titel eines Journals oder einer Zeitschrift | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | ||||
| Verlag: | SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ort der Veröffentlichung: | LONDON | ||||
| Datum | 29 August 2023 | ||||
| Institutionen | Humanwissenschaften > Institut für Sportwissenschaft | ||||
| Identifikationsnummer |
| ||||
| Stichwörter / Keywords | GENDER-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE-PROCESSES; SPATIAL ABILITIES; WORKING-MEMORY; ITEM TYPES; FIGURES; WOMEN; SPEED; STEREOTYPES; MAGNITUDE; Mental rotation; sex differences; test design; multiple choice | ||||
| Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie 700 Künste und Unterhaltung > 796 Sport | ||||
| Status | Veröffentlicht | ||||
| Begutachtet | Ja, diese Version wurde begutachtet | ||||
| An der Universität Regensburg entstanden | Ja | ||||
| URN der UB Regensburg | urn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-550161 | ||||
| Dokumenten-ID | 55016 |
Downloadstatistik
Downloadstatistik