Direkt zum Inhalt

Breckwoldt, Jan ; Svensson, Jörg ; Lingemann, Christian ; Gruber, Hans

Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study

Breckwoldt, Jan, Svensson, Jörg, Lingemann, Christian und Gruber, Hans (2014) Does clinical teacher training always improve teaching effectiveness as opposed to no teacher training? A randomized controlled study. BMC Medical Education 14 (6), S. 1-8.

Veröffentlichungsdatum dieses Volltextes: 21 Jan 2014 08:32
Artikel
DOI zum Zitieren dieses Dokuments: 10.5283/epub.29357


Zusammenfassung

Background Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this study, the impact of a clinical teacher training on teaching effectiveness was assessed in an ...

Background
Teacher training may improve teaching effectiveness, but it might also have paradoxical effects. Research on expertise development suggests that the integration of new strategies may result in a temporary deterioration of performance until higher levels of competence are reached. In this study, the impact of a clinical teacher training on teaching effectiveness was assessed in an intensive course in emergency medicine. As primary study outcome students’ practical skills at the end of their course were chosen.
Methods
The authors matched 18 clinical teachers according to clinical experience and teaching experience and then randomly assigned them to a two-day-teacher training, or no training. After 14 days, both groups taught within a 12-hour intensive course in emergency medicine for undergraduate students. The course followed a clearly defined curriculum. After the course students were assessed by structured clinical examination (SCE) and MCQ. The teaching quality was rated by students using a questionnaire.
Results
Data for 96 students with trained teachers, and 97 students with untrained teachers were included. Students taught by untrained teachers performed better in the SCE domains ‘alarm call’ (p < 0.01) and ‘ventilation’ (p = 0.01), while the domains ‘chest compressions’ and ‘use of automated defibrillator’ did not differ. MCQ scores revealed no statistical difference. Overall, teaching quality was rated significantly better by students of untrained teachers (p = 0.05).
Conclusions
At the end of a structured intensive course in emergency medicine, students of trained clinical teachers performed worse in 2 of 4 practical SCE domains compared to students of untrained teachers. In addition, subjective evaluations of teaching quality were worse in the group of trained teachers. Difficulties in integrating new strategies in their teaching styles might be a possible explanation.



Beteiligte Einrichtungen


Details

DokumentenartArtikel
Titel eines Journals oder einer ZeitschriftBMC Medical Education
Verlag:BMC
Band:14
Nummer des Zeitschriftenheftes oder des Kapitels:6
Seitenbereich:S. 1-8
Datum2014
InstitutionenHumanwissenschaften > Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften > Lehrstuhl für Pädagogik III (Prof. Dr. Hans Gruber)
Identifikationsnummer
WertTyp
10.1186/1472-6920-14-6DOI
Verwandte URLs
URLURL Typ
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/6Verlag
Stichwörter / KeywordsExpertise; Faculty development; Standardized clinical examination; Teacher training; Teaching effectiveness
Dewey-Dezimal-Klassifikation300 Sozialwissenschaften > 370 Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
StatusVeröffentlicht
BegutachtetJa, diese Version wurde begutachtet
An der Universität Regensburg entstandenZum Teil
URN der UB Regensburgurn:nbn:de:bvb:355-epub-293570
Dokumenten-ID29357

Bibliographische Daten exportieren

Nur für Besitzer und Autoren: Kontrollseite des Eintrags

nach oben