The ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts: Measurement, cognitive processes, nomological network, and relevance for academic success at the university
Münchow, Hannes, Richter, Tobias, von der Mühlen, Sarah and Schmid, Sebastian (2019) The ability to evaluate arguments in scientific texts: Measurement, cognitive processes, nomological network, and relevance for academic success at the university. British Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (3), pp. 501-523.Date of publication of this fulltext: 03 Sep 2021 09:51
Article
Alternative links to fulltext
Involved Institutions
Details
| Item type | Article | ||||
| Journal or Publication Title | British Journal of Educational Psychology | ||||
| Publisher: | Wiley | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place of Publication: | HOBOKEN | ||||
| Volume: | 89 | ||||
| Number of Issue or Book Chapter: | 3 | ||||
| Page Range: | pp. 501-523 | ||||
| Date | 2019 | ||||
| Institutions | Human Sciences > Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften Human Sciences > Institut für Erziehungswissenschaften > Lehrstuhl für Pädagogik I (Prof. Dr. Klaus-Peter Wild) | ||||
| Identification Number |
| ||||
| Keywords | INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; LITERACY; SCIENCE; LEARN; plausibility judgements; recognition of argumentation fallacies; nomological network; academic success | ||||
| Dewey Decimal Classification | 300 Social sciences > 370 Education | ||||
| Status | Published | ||||
| Refereed | Yes, this version has been refereed | ||||
| Created at the University of Regensburg | Yes | ||||
| Item ID | 48311 |
Export bibliographical data
Owner only: item control page
Altmetric
Altmetric